Was a real tossup here which image to make the main, and which to put in the comments. I may have gotten it wrong...

The thing I look for most in a picture, is the models face. This lady has a stunning body, but no image in this set has a good shot of her face. This appears to be her first set, so I am looking forward to new sets, where her face can shine.

Love the facial expression.

They are recycling all of their old sets. Took a bit to find but here is the statement from their website.

TOKYODOLL.tv will stop updating photo and video data after the last data update on October 21, 2023. This is due to the recent world situation and our company's management.
In the future, TOKYODOLL.tv will return to the first update on 2015, so if you need to cancel your membership or change your payment period, please do so.
Thank you very much for your long term use since 2015.

Is a pity as their content has a unique feel to it.

Possible, the Polaroid was a fixed focus camera, which did have nice bokeh. That said, the widest (shallowest dept of field) setting on most Polaroids was f-11, which for close up work still gives a decent depth of field. (The smallest aperture was f-64).

I have seen photos (not this set) where the model was stating at about a 15 degree angle to the camera (straight on would be 0 degrees) and one nipple was in focus and the other was not.

I personally think, my opinion only, that it is a combination of two factors. The first being auto focus. The second being the lack, except on high end cameras of a split prism or micro prism view finder.

All of that said, it also depends on what you are looking at the image on. Most of the photos of this set, when looked at as thumbnails, or mid definition, look ok. It helps that the human eye/brain smooths things out. If you are looking at this set on a cell phone sized display I think it would be fine. I however am looking at the images on 31.5" displays.

I will also admit I am totally OCD about foreground portions of the photo (the model) being in focus.

A bit of a gripe with this set. There were a number of amazing poses in this set. However, half of the picture, in nearly all of them was out of focus. I don't understand how today's photographers do not understand depth of field (focus). Even more so that studios like Met Art would accept workmanship of such poor quality.

Left to right

Hopeless SoFrantic AKA Juniper Hope
Kawaiii Kitten AKA Elizabeth Reed
Emily Bloom
Abigale

The set is 'Babewatch' for TheEmilyBloom

This is from 'Ass and Pussy' from Ultrafilms. Released Jun 15, 2020.

Currently, posts are NOT automatically flagged NSFW. Checked this in two communities.

The amount of kink shaming in this thread is disappointing.

One of my kinks is young, beautiful, ladies. None of these ladies would ever want to have anything to do with me. The are a fantasy. At the same time I have no interest in anyone underaged. I go to great extents to make sure what I post is legal. There are a number of studios from Brazil, Columbia, Japan, Vietnam, and China that I would love to post from, but they don't legally or structurally provide 18 USC 2257 confirmation.

When it comes to OC content, the most important aspect of any model to me is her face/eyes. It is what I look at first in any photo. This by itself eliminates a large portion of OC content for me. Further as a professional photographer, the light, composition, and concept of the photo are important. These aspects are often missing or poorly understood in OC content. Thats ok. For those that like OC content, I am glad it is here for you.

As to the original question, A for now.

On to the problems.

I tend to post large images. I stay under what are the poorly documented limits. Often in posting an image it will fail with an error message that makes no sense. (SyntaxError: Unexpected token 'R', "Request er"... is not valid JSON) Many times, simply reposting the same image works. On other images, which have a smaller height and width (in pixels), and take up less storage (in MB) than what I have found as practical maximums, they just will not post. (Yes, I have posted this as an issue on the lemmy-ui GitHub.)

Lemmy in general, and LemmyNSFW in specific are much harder than reddit or other historical platforms to explore, and find the material you enjoy. Part of this is most posters are only posting in one or a very few communities. On reddit, I would find someone who was posting stuff I liked, I would click on their profile and use that to find other subreddits I would like. Additionally many subreddits, would have a list of "our friends" in the side bar, which is very rare here.

Staying on exploration, the search tools in the default web UI (simply navigating to https://lemmynsfw.com/ in a browser) are lacking. The only way to improve this is to make suggestions / get invoked with the development of the code. There are also, that I am aware of no communities like r/NSFW411/ or r/wowthissubexists/ (specifically the Fap Friday Thread) to help with finding new stuff.

As to the front page, whether you sort by active or hot what you tend to see is stuff that was recently posted. As there are a few posters, bots or not, that tend to post 15+ posts at a given time, those are what dominate the front page. If it is stuff you like, great, if not... Since this is generated automatically by Lemmy, you either need to come up with and code a new algorithm, throttle posting, or get more active posters.

As a final note, to the admins of LemmyNSFW and all the mods and posters who contribute. Thank You very much.

For what it is worth, 碧しの (Shinto Aoi) was born in 1990. This set was shot in 2016. 碧しの was 25, it was before her birthday, when this set was shot.

To add on the the note, for people interested in more than just one image. TheNude is one of the best sites to find out more about any given model. Most web sites try to be "sticky" and keep you on them. TheNude not only has a wealth of basic information, but has links to other sites that can expand your search. Other good sites are Indexxx and IAFD. (IAFD is more for porn stars, and less for glamour models.)