yogthos

joined 6 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 8 points 5 hours ago
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 hours ago

I'm really excited to play it. I'm going through Planet of Lana 2 right now, and this one's next on my list. Good to hear it's a lot like DE in a fantasy setting.

 
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 9 points 7 hours ago

I'm a bit surprised the bubble kept going as long as it did. It's absolutely wild how investors just kept throwing hundreds of billions at tech that didn't have any clear business model, no market fit, and wasn't making any substantial revenue.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 9 points 7 hours ago

may we see more in the coming weeks

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

We're now clearly seeing that the whole narrative of liberalism being a more free society was pure nonsense all along. The only reason there hasn't been much censorship in the west before was due to the fact that mainstream liberal narrative was dominant. When majority of people willingly believed it, there was no need to do policing at state level. In fact, people would effectively police themselves, we still see this happening all the time today. Liberals will generally refuse to read news from sources outside of mainstream media, and automatically dismiss any information that comes outside their usual information bubble. This has been particularly prominent with the conflict in Ukraine, where despite all the predictions in western mainstream consistently being wrong, people would continue to cling to the narrative. Meanwhile, people with different views and perspectives would generally choose not to voice them for fear of being ostracized from polite company, having their social status affected, or having their careers ruined. Those who would dare to question the system would be pushed to the fringes. Dissident academics such as Michael Parenti would find it difficult to keep positions in universities, get tenure, or get published. And so, the west ended up with a greatest propaganda narrative about freedom of speech and right to expression.

But now that the mainstream is shrinking. More and more people falling due to decline in their material conditions, and non western media is becoming increasingly easy to access. Chinese media is now penetrating into the US exposing people to completely different perspectives. All of a sudden there's a need for censorship to keep the official narrative going. Now that the media advantage is fading, and people are increasingly starting to question things, the system of self policing is no longer sufficient to keep people in line.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Show us a single example of when a US intervention made life better for people. What Americans want is to destroy Iran, and they're not even hiding it https://youtu.be/ogt9g-rTa3o?t=376

If you want Iran to be turned into another Libya or Syria then you're just piece of human garbage. Scum like you enables every western atrocity.

 

the site with the numbers: https://ukrainewarlosses.org/

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 10 points 11 hours ago
 

The core thesis of this paper is that the AI community needs to stop treating autonomous agents as just another text generation problem and start building comprehensive infrastructure to support closed loop learning. The authors argue that achieving reliable agentic behavior requires a full stack ecosystem that unifies data synthesis with sandboxed execution and specialized reinforcement learning. To prove this point they introduce the Agentic Learning Ecosystem which consists of an RL framework called ROLL alongside a sandbox manager named ROCK and an agent interface known as iFlow CLI. They believe that isolating models in static training environments is a dead end for solving complex real world workflows.

The team developed an open source model named ROME using a tightly integrated training pipeline with reproducible execution environments which allowed a relatively small 30 billion parameter model to rival or beat massive proprietary models exceeding 100 billion parameters on difficult software engineering benchmarks.

A big part of their argument rests on the idea that credit assignment in reinforcement learning needs to change. They propose a novel algorithm called Interaction Perceptive Agentic Policy Optimization which shifts the reward focus from individual text tokens to broader semantic interaction chunks. This chunk level optimization stabilizes the training process over long horizons and prevents the policy collapse often seen in complex tool use scenarios.

We're increasingly seeing a shift of priorities away from raw data scale and focus on the systematic infrastructure as the actual bedrock of next generation models.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 13 points 13 hours ago

the least propagandized liberal has logged on

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 7 points 15 hours ago

Yeah, taking any single city isn't going to change anything. Also, they have developed a whole mosaic defense strategy to decentralize command specifically to prevent the possibility of any sort of decapitation strike https://www.palestinechronicle.com/explainer-what-is-irans-mosaic-defense-strategy/

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 15 hours ago

That could be an aspect too.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 15 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

There are other factors too. The US has a limited number of bases in the region which Iran is systematically taking apart right now. These provide logistics for staging, ammo storage, early warning systems, air defenses, and so on. These bases took decades and trillions to build, and they simply cannot be replaced. While Iran is simply too big to bomb into submission, the same logic doesn't apply to the limited US assets in the region.

Another huge factor is that the US has to ship weapons across the ocean, which is slow and expensive. Iranians are fighting on the home turf, and they effectively have unlimited weapons by comparison. And of course there's the fact that Iranian weapons are simply more efficient. The US is forced to use multiple multi million dollar interceptors to take down each drone that costs a few thousand to make. It's obvious that Iran can pump out drones faster than the US can pump out missiles.

Finally, the whole idea of ground invasion is a fantasy. Iran is a country of 90 million, with difficult mountainous terrain. For context, Ukraine is a third of the size, and Russia has an army of 1.5 million fighting there.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 10 points 18 hours ago

They're absolutely operating with insurance. They're just insured outside the west.

view more: next ›