zagaberoo

Well, these services do require money to run. If everyone were as 'clever' as you are then we'd have little content indeed.

It's 1/4, that's why you get two dice jokers in the fragile challenge.

Needs approval by 3/4 of state legislatures; it's not enough to control the US congress. Supreme court shenanigans or some other BS is much more likely.

This is referred to as healthspan or HALE and has been gaining research interest in recent decades.

I thought the same thing; I'd love to see more low-poly style IRL. The CT looks impressively terrible from the back though.

There's plenty of great stuff in there; I especially recommend filtering for dead hardware.

I can't say I feel the prog vibes in this one.

I just the other day edited a Steam config file with some wacky file extension by cracking it open in notepad. Bless plain text.

Don't forget Kodi!

I'm not complaining; I'm clarifying for less informed readers. It's a subtle and often misleading distinction.

Calling a license that leads to more proprietary software "even more open source" is absolutely debatable. The only extra restriction is disallowing free software becoming proprietary, which promotes more openness overall.

You're not wrong by any means, but people should understand the actual tradeoff when considering licenses.

More open strictly in that it allows free software to be rolled up into proprietary software.

Just because competition can be suppressed temporarily within a discrete system doesn't mean it has ceased to exist. Exactly why ideologies that demand the absence of competition will eventually be outcompeted from the outside.