I find this topic to be extremely political but it's like it has fallen between the cracks of the political discourse. I could be wrong, of course.

Many countries worldwide are trying to implement some sort of digital ID and digital wallet.

The way this is portrayed by systemic sources is that it is going to be just like our regular ID and wallet. Just better for us.

Even tho the specifics will be different, there are some characteristics that will be standard. Both will be linked and controlled by a centralised entity or a combination of centralised entities (i.e. a government and a central bank).

Meaning, someone else has total control over the content of your wallet, this includes our ID and our digital money (see Central Bank Digital Currency). CBDCs are going to be a by default a 2-tier system retail (for people) and wholesale (for big institutions). And this is why this system will not be like our regular IDs or wallets.

Even tho as mentioned in this article this new approach needs to be adopted by the public, there are ways to force the public to do so. For example it could be required to use this system for tax purposes.

This is already a lot, and in the same time not enough. Some more info on the topic, coming from institutional sources can be found here:

European Union

• A digital ID and personal digital wallet for EU citizens, residents and businesses

World Economic Forum

• Reimagining Digital ID
• How universal wallets can help businesses unleash the full potential of digital identity
• CBDCs come in two forms: retail and wholesale. What's the difference?

Wiki

• History of CBDCs by country

Pocket link

Lengthy PDF discussing how certain technologies such as nuclear power shape power dynamics around them towards authoritarianism.

Available in the latest release.

From an unfinished documentary on Anarchism filmed in 2010. Interesting because it presages the term 'Infrapolitics' by several years. There is a different nuance, but also has a lot in common.

This is a niche topic and I'm not sure this is the right community. Let's say we start to move on to a society less focused on capital. Not perfect but on the way there. There are still companies and there is an overall economy running around small businesses. How would a small business get started without access to "capital"? What are the alternatives?

New book by Yanis Varoufakis

Full text available from the Internet Archive and Void Network.

"The street is always two steps ahead of theory"

-- Benjamin Shepard, PhD., Assistant Professor of Human Services

Paywalled New York Review of Books link

Ostensibly a review of "Money and Government: The Past and Future of Economics" by Robert Skidelsky, Occupy Wallstreet economist David Graeber uses the New York Review of Books as a platform to toss intellectual bombs at the foundations of the academic field of economics.

Graeber exposes orthodox economics as an expression of academic politics and institutional power, rather than a sincere practice of science. He dynamites foundational principles like the quantity theory of money, the efficient market hypothesis, and the concept of economic microfoundations themselves.

Perhaps dismal but not science, economics is an ecclesiastical field of infrapolitical struggle, one in which the clergy of its orthodoxy must be toppled to allow science to return and society thrive.