this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
233 points (95.3% liked)

Music

9216 readers
76 users here now

↳ Our family Communities:

➰#Music

Music.world - !music@lemmy.world

Jazz -!jazz@lemmy.world

Album Art Porn - !albumartporn@lemmy.world

Fake Album Covers - !fakealbumcovers@lemm.ee

Obscure Music - !ObscureMusic@lemm.ee

Vinyl and LP's - !vinyl@lemmy.world

Electronic Dance Music - !edm@reddthat.com

60's Music - !60smusic@lemmy.world

70's Music - !70smusic@lemmy.world

80's Music - !80smusic@lemmy.world

90's Music - !90smusic@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] foggy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Studio time is not expensive today.

It was cost prohibitive in the 69s, 70s, 80s, early 90s.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i mean, how cost prohibitive though. Instruments cost money, people still produce music with instruments these days.

Shit costs money. That's just the name of the game.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Paper costs money, pens cost money

You're thinking with yesterday's figures.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i mean you're speaking in absolutes here, im assuming you have data to back it up.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Try Google. Not going to entertain this with my time because it's on a level of dumb that


Try Google homie.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i mean i could. I'm not the one making the claim that it was prohibitive though.