200
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by WhyEssEff@hexbear.net to c/electoralism@hexbear.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Adkml@hexbear.net 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

If your argument is "sure we abandoned that vulnerable minority and have decided were ok with them being genocide but we'd never do that to you." You really ought to actually do something that doesn't make it incredibly obvious that's a fucking lie.

The concept of solidarity is literally co.pletely foreign to the liberal. Selling out somebody else for personal benefit is literally the best they can come up with because it's all they know.

"Sure we're genociding Palestinians but we're willing to say the same thing shouldn't happen to Trans people" can turn into "sure we're genociding trams people but we're willing to say the same thing shouldn't happen to gay people" and then "sure we're genociding gay people but we're willing to say the same shouldn't happen to racial minorities" in like 2 elections.

"Were fine with genocide as long as it means we win elections" is not the unifying message they thi k it is.

this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2024
200 points (99.5% liked)

electoralism

21901 readers
148 users here now

Welcome to c/electoralism! politics isn't just about voting or running for office, but this community is.

Please read the Chapo Code of Conduct and remember...we're all comrades here.

Shitposting in other comms please!

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS