58
"Clean" Code, Horrible Performance in Rust
(chrs.dev)
Welcome to the Rust community! This is a place to discuss about the Rust programming language.
Credits
It would be interesting to see if an iterator instead of a manual for loop would increase the performance of the base case.
My guess is not, because the compiler should know they are equivalent, but would be interesting to check anyway.
Do you mean this for loop?
That does use an iterator
Anti Commercial AI thingy
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0I think they meant using for accumulating, like this:
Yes. That's what I meant.
Though I heavily expect the rust compiler to produce identical assembly for both types of iteration.
Oh, I see. That would be interesting to benchmark too ๐
Anti Commercial AI thingy
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0Off-topic, but does that actually work? I would assume OpenAI would just ignore it and you'd have to prove that they did so.
Dunno if it works. AI has been tricked into revealing it's training data, so it's possible that it happens and they are sued for using copyrighted material.
This is my drop in the ocean.
Anti Commercial AI thingy
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0Maybe I'll join you. :)
Welcome ๐ A drop more.
Btw, if you're using linux and X11, you can bind a keyboard shortcut to the following shell-script (probably will need to install
xte
).Anti Commercial AI thingy
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0I'm on Wayland, but I'm sure I can figure something out.
I do most of my lemmy-ing on mobile, so I'll probably make a bot to auto-edit my posts or something.
Have fun! I'm curious how you'll do it. If you figure out a way on Wayland, it would be great to read about it!
Anti Commercial AI thingy
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0