131
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by SovietReporter@lemmygrad.ml to c/thedeprogram@lemmygrad.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] novibe@lemmy.ml -1 points 5 months ago

I don’t think Mao meant that communists should become capitalists… he meant it makes sense to align with nationalist bourgeoisie to fight off a common enemy, like international and imperialist capital.

I wholeheartedly disagree that the best way to run anything under this system to be a private company. Unless “the best way” means the most profitable. Sure exploiting the labor of others is always gonna be more profitable. Even if you pay your workers well and give them nice benefits. But you’re still exploiting them, for profit.

I don’t understand how you can’t see how antithetical to what being a communist is. Unless you accept JT is just selling the product of communism and anti-capitalism, that he is just the expression of capitalism commodifying everything including the fight and resistance against itself… and like it? I don’t understand how this is fine and acceptable.

Shouldn’t we hold ourselves to higher standards..? It’s a thing being born into privilege and using that to help the communist cause. It’s another to climb the ladders of capitalist exploitation using the mantle of revolutionary thought.

[-] axont@hexbear.net 26 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Gonna be completely honest, I don't put this much thought into how a person runs a YouTube channel because it doesn't seem that consequential to me. It's entertainment and a product. If JT were also a landlord or running exploitative farm labor you'd have more of a point, but if he's making internet videos in an office I just can't really muster the emotional capacity to say he's betraying the working class or whatever. He's an internet content creator, not a revolutionary with an AK.

Yes, you're right. JT is selling a commodity. It just is what it is. You're not going to find the fight against capitalism in YouTube videos and podcasts. They're all commodities being sold to you. Maybe I'm cynical.

[-] novibe@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago

You are right, I agree with your points. But then why would anyone praise and defend this? Sure it’s just slop, content, but then why put people like this on a pedestal as thought-leaders? A capitalist selling you the idea of liberation…

[-] Haas@lemmygrad.ml 17 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I tend to agree with your conclusion, but I'm gonna run with the argument. If JT is a capitalist selling the idea of liberation, does this mean his videos were somehow more proletarian or revolutionary before he employed people? He still "sold" the idea of liberation, he just didn't engage in labour exploitation to do it.

Besides, I think you're missing the point of the post. JT was explaining why it's neccesary for Second Thought to generate revenue, and like another commenter said, that would still be neccessary even if the channel was a coop.

Also, we don't have any information on how the business is structured or what the workplace's democracy looks like. After all, the only thing that really determines if it's labour exploitation or not is what happens with the surplus value the ~~company~~ workers generate. If it goes to JT, sure, he's a capitalist, but we don't have that kind of information, so I'm not willing to make that judgement (yet).

[-] novibe@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 months ago

There is a collective in Brazil called Soberana. They have a lot of presence in online spaces, and they are Marxist-Leninists. They employ no one, they help each other but they each acts as an “independent” propagandist. They don’t need to make a profit as an organisation to survive. The efforts and works of each member, directed in tasks, is what keeps the collective going.

Each individual might or might not try to make a living out of producing propaganda, but it’s not a profit incentive as they are just laborers making money off their work. Their incentive is to survive.

I understand JT was explaining his reasoning, but it falls short of what he espouses. Sure his private company needs to make a profit to survive. This profit is the direct surplus value from the employees’ labor. Before he had a private company with a profit motive, his only incentive was to survive within the system as a worker. He has completely different incentives as a business owner, diametrically opposed even, no? That’s the whole basis of class, his material incentives are now different. Would he sacrifice the business he’s been growing for years because of ideology? Perhaps, but it’s more likely he’d sacrifice ideology for the business instead.

[-] KrasMazov@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 5 months ago

Your example is not that good. Soberana members like Ian Neves and João Carvalho still have video editors and other people that directly work with them, even if Soberana itself don't have that.

We are all living in capitalism, if that type of thing is needed for us to be able to spread class consciousness, then it needs to be done. JT is not hypocritical for doing things this way, it's the unfortunate reality if he wants to continue to be a propagandist.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)
this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2024
131 points (99.2% liked)

The Deprogram Podcast

827 readers
11 users here now

International Anti-Capitalist podcast run by an American, Slav and an Arab.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS