Mamdani is going to sneak up behind Netanyahu and press the O button to do a knockdown move and then he'll attach the Fulton recovery system
Then Netanyahu will be assigned to the brig on mother base
Mamdani is going to sneak up behind Netanyahu and press the O button to do a knockdown move and then he'll attach the Fulton recovery system
Then Netanyahu will be assigned to the brig on mother base
Yeah this is it right here. They like looking at their net worth increase but only in terms of money or stocks. Maybe they think once it hits a certain threshold everything will be fine, or maybe they just want to rack up the score before they die.
I mean if you ask a smug liberal from a coastal city if very right wing states like Louisiana or Alabama should be bombed or starved they'd probably say yes. Look at how they talk about the south whenever there's a bad hurricane or something.
The only people who fit the criteria for the liberal conception of communists are Caleb Maupin and that Haz guy. They're self styled communists who do speak positively about Putin and modern Russia. They also talk fondly about...the United States and talk shit about...service workers. They're the ones who are incoherent.
They're also virulent antisemites and pal around with actual fascists like that Dugin guy. My point here is that Maupin and Haz are probably feds or fed adjacent. And somehow these guys have become what a large groups of liberals believe a communist is.
This is the most cognitive dissonance I've ever seen in a person. Their leaders are warmongers so we need to do warfare against them.
?????
And we're talking about countries like Palestine, Iran, and Syria? Oh so countries that haven't invaded anyone in like 100 years? They're the warmongers? The only wars these countries have been involved in, within the past century, were from the other side, fighting off invaders.
Modern Russia has invaded several other countries but I don't think many of us defend the invasion of Georgia. I personally defend the invasion of Crimea for a bunch of reasons. The consensus around here with Ukraine seems to be that it's an unfortunate reality of Russia being boxed in by NATO and this is the result.
I'm so frustrated with liberals who don't understand it was Harris who was supposed to make her policy clear. If Harris was supposed to be so much better than Trump, especially in regards to Palestine, she should have made that evident to voters, including ambivalent voters. Except she ran a campaign that was primarily about begging for rich donors since no one thought she would win.
You don't signal how much better you are than the opposition by gaining, then bragging about, the endorsement of fucking Dick Cheney. Do liberals just not remember this guy? He's pure evil, one of the most extensive lists of war crimes and death can be levied upon him. He's possibly the largest architect of death of the 21st century so far. It would be like the Beach Boys bragging about how good their music is because they're pals with Charles Manson.
Liberals, just admit you don't care about Palestinian people and you have no values at all. Or admit you're gullible and somehow sincerely believed Harris would somehow stop the genocide she was actively perpetrating.
the liberal has no beliefs. She believes in nothing other than aligning with what she perceives is the socially acceptable left-liberal position. It should have been obvious she no longer had a soul when she was willingly hanging out with Hillary Clinton. Contrapoints is not a person with beliefs other than she deserves an audience. She's an empty vessel, she's a husk who wants attention. She wants a personal mythology and adoring fans. Everything she says is run through a filter to calculate the best possible audience retention. This is a person for whom beliefs and internal conviction are not an avenue to change the world, but rather beliefs are a malleable problem to be solved by choosing the correct postures in order to gain some mythical mainstream appeal.
The liberal is someone who believes there is a correct position, not necessarily correct on its own merits or based upon personal experience, but instead it's correct by virtue of how much of an audience it can get. But it's not even properly calibrated, it's based on the perception of what a broad liberal audience may agree with. Like I'm reminded of how Chuck Schumer has an imaginary retired couple who lives in Long Island or something, and before he does anything, he considers what their opinion might be. Liberals have given themselves imaginary brain creatures who whisper in their ears on what to say and do, because they know if they only acted based on conviction, if they only said words based on their own beliefs, the only words out of their mouths would be "i want to be popular."
people can have values beyond posturing? What? You don't simply drop your values when a liberal tells you something isn't "politically viable"?
I think it has more to do with grok declaring itself MechaHitler and saying Jews are gonna do a white genocide
The American economy would shit itself if it were possible to simply be a quiet family that works retail jobs and raises a kid on 1 and a half incomes. Every aspect of American life for lower income people is presumed to have debt involved. Credit cards, home loans, medical debt, car payments. Those are how the gears turn and it's what the capitalist class wants. They don't want stable, financially independent workers. They want debt slaves who live off payday loans.
Maybe it is possible to live like Dr. Racist is suggesting, but it would involve a series of implausible circumstances to the point it's not worth considering. It would be a family who somehow has no debt, a stable living circumstance, an assumed promotion after one year, no medical emergencies, no accidents, no layoffs, no sudden natural disasters, nothing. It would be threading a needle every single day, for the rest of their lives. Getting a royal flush every day.
More succiently I guess it's like, humans know the game and the rules, but this LLM just goes after what's predictable. It can't obfuscate what it actually means because it doesn't mean anything. You tell it to say less woke things and it'll reply "ok chief, time to be a Nazi."
Reactionaries know they're being giggling little shits, whether they know they're hiding behind deniability or not. AI doesn't know any of that, it just sees how most anti-woke, anti-PC rhetoric is the same as 4chan fascism, so it goes for the explicit fascism
Yeah but how they've even encountered maga communists is a mystery. They're so niche you have to basically be a politics nerd like one of us. How they conflate maga communists with normal Marxists is another question entirely. The only answer I've come up with is there's someone at the state department pushing this stuff