657
Anon finds his people (sh.itjust.works)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 1 points 8 months ago

You mean gay? Or homosexual?

And why would they censor that and not “fag”, when the former are also used as neutral descriptions while the latter is almost exclusively used in a derogatory way?

And also, do I even have to point out how ridiculous it is to promote freedom of information while simultaneously selectively censoring certain words? That’s literally Russia levels of hypocrisy right there.

[-] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

No I mean f a g g o t is censored. Which is doubly ironic since fag isn't

[-] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 5 points 8 months ago

Perhaps because it would upset British folks talking about their cigarettes?

this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2024
657 points (97.3% liked)

Greentext

4657 readers
2031 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS