589
submitted 8 months ago by jhymesba@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

While rebutting another post here on Lemmy, I ran into this. This says exactly what I want to say.

I am not a friend of Biden's Administration. I think they drug their feet over a variety of things ranging from holding Trump and his goons accountable for January 6th through rulemaking on issues like OTC Birth Control and abortion rights, and yes, I think he's too quick to please big business. But then I remember what the alternative is, and ... well, disappointed in Biden or not, I'm voting for him. Because my wife is a Black bisexual goth woman, four strikes under Team Pepe's tent. And I have my own strikes for marrying her as a White dude, and respecting her right to not have kids since she doesn't want them is another strike against me. And I care about my Non-Christian, Gay, Transgender, and Minority friends, and will never willingly subject them to Team Pepe.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Gotta stop lumping all the players in one side together. Biden is not doing anything by himself and neither is the fat orange. Gotta pull out the microscope to see who is who and where and why rather than hitting on a single name. The house and senate are the major string pulling yoyos in everything that comes out of washington

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Biden is not doing anything by himself and neither is the fat orange.

That is a big part of the problem. If Biden's camp was full of Green New Deal Dems and peaceniks and Justice Party economic reformers, I'd have a lot easier time supporting him.

Instead, he's surrounded himself with corporate flacks, banksters, MIC ghouls, and evangelicals, hoping to peel off the moderate Republican wing of the conservative party one more time.

The house and senate are the major string pulling yoyos in everything that comes out of washington

I would say that the donors are at the end of the strings, while House and Senate simply dance to their tunes. And when you consider how much influence a guy like Sam Bankman Fried had with "blue state" senators like Gillibrand and senior white house advisers like Steve Ricchetti, I gotta say I'm not thrilled to see the direction this party went in his first four years.

Even before you get to the Palestinian Genocide or the continued US blockade of Cuban ports or the migrant prisons lining the US border or the rapid domestic increase in carbon emissions under a President who claimed to acknowledge climate change, it seems like liberals cannot bring themselves to see the naked mismanagement, graft, and cowardice of the current President.

Boeing airliners are literally falling out of the sky and Biden's FAA is still dragging its heels, for fear of upsetting one of the nation's most well-financed lobbying teams. No federal prosecution of the Trump Administration is scheduled to move forward before November.

By any standard, this Presidency has been a failure.

[-] capital@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago
[-] hglman@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 months ago

Making a little effort rather than absolutely no effort doesn't make it a Good effort. Terrible analysis. Additionally the whole mst oil production in US history sort of really undermines everything.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

The climate bill was so comprehensive that it forced Europe to pass a similar bill while grumbling. And preliminary analysis of the bill suggested it would remove 6.5 kg of emissions for every 1 kg it enabled. That's a big deal.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/dec/07/visualised-how-all-of-g20-is-missing-climate-goals-but-some-nations-are-closer-than-others

The US’s forecast 2030 emissions of more than 5bn metric tonnes is significantly higher than the 1.9bn metric tonnes it was allocated by the analysts under a 1.5C-compatible fair share model.

This, combined with our largest trading partners - from China to Mexico/Canada to Saudi Arabia - all doing even worse, means a marginal decrease in emissions domestically will have no hope of meeting the 1.5C target for 2030. We are already cresting the 2C horizon this year and accelerating our rate of warming.

https://apnews.com/article/climate-change-hot-world-meteorological-organization-6096b3b604025aea9dee07a653907b55

The infrastructure act has been far too little and far too late, even setting aside how much of it is being squandered to appease profit-hungry American industrialists, more concerned with competing against global imports than curbing the global warming rate.

[-] capital@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

I find myself having to repeat this over and over.

Consider the context of the OP.

Would Trump be better on this front?

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

I had a much better time with a Trump/Pelosi government than I'm having with a Biden/Johnson government. If nothing else, watching him get impeached again would be more entertaining than arguing over how much nerve gas to send to the Israelis.

[-] capital@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

I asked if Trump would be better on climate and you attempted a pivot but you're not gonna bullshit me.

You're not serious so I'm out.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

I asked if Trump would be better on climate

If you want to go hard on the numbers, Trump's pandemic was the best thing to happen to the climate since the early Obama Administration investment in green energy.

Joe Biden has seen nothing but emissions growth since he took office. The benefits of the Infrastructure Act remain speculative at best. But shutting down air travel for months and curtailing business activity nationally for the better part of two years? Possibly the greatest act of Degrowth committed in the United States since the Civil War.

You’re not serious so I’m out.

Democrats have all been on board with Crypto investments and AI expansion, both of which have been voracious consumers of domestic energy and water reserves. Republicans consistently tank the Tech sector while in office.

If you care about climate change, bankrupting Silicon Valley would be a great place to start.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

By any standard, this Presidency has been a failure.

Yep so let's help elect an actual fascist that says he'll finish the job in Gaza, has never seen a corrupt dollar that he didn't want deposited in his bank account, wants to shoot protestors, extrajudicially executed antifa in the Pacific Northwest with federal goons, wants to be a dictator "only on day one", and has already attempted to overthrow the government because he didn't like the way an election turned out.

Also, nevermind the fact that in a global pandemic the fucking guy wanted us to inject disinfectant, said the disease would go away like magic, had store shelves so empty we were wiping our asses with our hands, and had his administration steal crucial supplies from frontline workers to auction off around the country.

Also set aside that he will let Russia steamroll Ukraine and will probably try to get the US out of NATO.

And that he's been indicted with something like 90 criminal counts and a dozen or more civil cases, some of which have already rendered judgements against him.

And nevermind the non-stop craziness of the general population when he was originally elected in 2016 who while flying his flag ran over protestors with their cars, screamed at people on airlines, went to pizza places with weaponry demanding answers.

Biden didn't singlehandedly turn everything around from it being a country on active fire in four years, so let's put Trump back in to finish the job both abroad and here at home.

We'll be a nice smoldering pile of rubble by next election season.

-- 💩🔥🇺🇸

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago

Yep so let’s help elect an actual fascist

Again, I refer you to the Electoral College.

this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2024
589 points (88.9% liked)

politics

19194 readers
2858 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS