this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2024
316 points (97.0% liked)

interestingasfuck

7652 readers
11 users here now

interestingasfuck

founded 2 years ago
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Very blurry for a powerful telescope. Wonder if it’s because moon is moving fast relative to close telescope so the effective shutter speed needs to be relatively high?

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Have we ruled out that the moon might just look like that? Like all fuzzy? How 'bout it, NASA?

[–] lefty7283@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

JWST primarily looks at very large objects that are far away. Titan (and really everything in the solar system) is relatively close to us, but are tiny in comparison to galaxies/nebulae, so their actual size as they appear in the sky is a lot smaller.

[–] johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also of note, most objects in the outer solar system are very dim.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Can't really claim we're all that bright in the inner solar system either.

[–] BigDaddySlim@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Must've left his glasses back on Earth

[–] clif@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Subtle dig at Hubble, I like it

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

I would assume it's because the object is too close. Like trying to do macro photography without a macro lense.

[–] wabafee@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's just mipmaps, high res texture is still loading.