47
submitted 3 months ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/physics@mander.xyz
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sudoreboot@slrpnk.net 5 points 3 months ago

tl;dr:

Peter Schauss at the University of Virginia says the wave packet is such a well-understood component of quantum theory that the findings of the new experiment are not surprising – but they do show that the researchers had a high degree of control over the processes used to cool and then precisely image the atoms.

I'm not entirely sure what they mean by having images of their waviness, because that is not how it works. You can not measure a quantum wave, because it isn't a "particle" wave but a wave-like distribution of mutually exclusive measurement outcomes. Taking a picture is the same as entangling yourself, which embeds you in the quantum wave function such that it describes all possible combinations of you ending up with every possible outcome.

[-] fossilesque@mander.xyz 5 points 3 months ago
[-] sudoreboot@slrpnk.net 7 points 3 months ago

As I understand it, they are making measurements of an otherwise single isolated particle as it moves about in a controlled space, and the measurements confirm (yet again) that the measurement outcomes match the probabilities given by the Schrödinger equation, which means that it interferes with itself.

The language used may lead some to think that we now have images showing a wave-like particle, but again, that's not something that can ever happen. What we have are boring old images of a single classical-looking particle, but the patterns they display tells us that quantum mechanics is very much at play in between the takes.

this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2024
47 points (94.3% liked)

Physics

1265 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS