18

Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid!

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post, there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)
Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] froztbyte@awful.systems 11 points 7 months ago

Not wanting to be left out of the action and let our good friends have all the robotic god fun, the catholic church has also got in on the action, and it went so good

From some of those replies you just know the kinds of training data it must’ve had.

[-] jax@awful.systems 18 points 7 months ago

this is most certainly a clerical error

[-] gerikson@awful.systems 17 points 7 months ago

From the bot-runners website:

Catholic Answers works each day to ensure our content is faithful to the Magisterium. Our staff apologists have decades of practice in apologetics, and several hold advanced degrees in theology and philosophy. We maintain a broad list of associates (clergy and laymen) who are experts in the fields of liturgy, history, bioethics, theology, philosophy, canon law, and more.

"And we've decided to throw the hard work of these people under the bus in favor of an unfinished toy that ridicules our faith. A consultant named Damien Thorn made a compelling case!"

[-] froztbyte@awful.systems 11 points 7 months ago

the imagery (in the article) is also amazing, it's like if someone took all the images of Civ leader dialogue screens as source material for ~~direct replication~~ "inspiration"

[-] dgerard@awful.systems 11 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

did nobody get the bot to write some python

[-] Soyweiser@awful.systems 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Python? I have rooted it, and the vatican is now mining bitcoin for me. (oddly, they already had a full mining kit installed, no idea how this P0P3 guy was, but took all his butts).

E: why is Chris Hansen at my door?

[-] dgerard@awful.systems 7 points 7 months ago

to help you move to another parish

[-] maol@awful.systems 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)
[-] gerikson@awful.systems 9 points 7 months ago

One thing I’d mention is that we spent a lot of time beta-testing this, with thousands of people, before we released it. We did six months of that beta-testing.

I’m sure they tested it, but were their testers the nice Catholic people they happen to know, or, you know, normal internet people?

this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2024
18 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1460 readers
321 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS