272
Secret Hamas Files Show How It Spied on Everyday Palestinians (www.nytimes.com)
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca to c/world@lemmy.world
137 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar has for years overseen a secret police force in Gaza that conducted surveillance on everyday Palestinians and built files on young people, journalists and those who questioned the government, according to intelligence officials and a trove of internal documents reviewed by The New York Times.

The unit, known as the General Security Service, relied on a network of Gaza informants, some of whom reported their own neighbors to the police. People landed in security files for attending protests or publicly criticizing Hamas. In some cases, the records suggest that the authorities followed people to determine if they were carrying on romantic relationships outside marriage.

Hamas has long run an oppressive system of governance in Gaza, and many Palestinians there know that security officials watch them closely. But a 62-slide presentation on the activities of the General Security Service, delivered only weeks before the Oct. 7 attack on Israel, reveals the degree to which the largely unknown unit penetrated the lives of Palestinians.

. . .

Everyday Gazans were stuck — behind the wall of Israel’s crippling blockade and under the thumb and constant watch of a security force. That dilemma continues today, with the added threat of Israeli ground troops and airstrikes.

MBFC
Archive

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] anticolonialist@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

The NYT is garbage state propaganda with no more journalistic credibility than the Enquirer

[-] efstajas@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Please. Of course the NYT are far from infallible, but "no more journalistic credibility than the Enquirer" is just a ridiculous statement. There's a lot to criticize about their reporting on Gaza, but at the same time they've published some of the rawest and most eye-opening coverage of the situation in Gaza I've come across.

[-] mholiv@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The NYT definitely has problems, but saying it has the same credibility as the Enquirer just makes you look ill informed. 🤡

[-] Beetlejuice001@lemmy.wtf -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

While I certainly agree to an extent, They’re not quite as bad as the National Enquirer, that’s ridiculous. I read the Archive version and it is very detailed and informative. Describes how Hamas, who we know is paid by Israel, spied and monitored Palestinians., to control opposition and prevent a two state solution. It’s no wonder everything turned out the way it did, Israel wanted it to. Bring on your downvotes bots

Edit:autocorrect

[-] VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works -2 points 3 months ago

You 'know' they're paid by Isreal? I'm guessing you know this because of totally real sources based on evidence...? No? Oh a feeling in your tummy that you want to be true because it makes you feel better to avoid reality and imagine the world as black and white? OK.

[-] Beetlejuice001@lemmy.wtf 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)
[-] VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

Yes they are arguing that by allowing aid info Gaza this props up hamas they are right wing people saying that Isreal should have been harder on hamas - you probably think Isreal should allow more aid into Palestine so either you want to prop up hamas, you don't really belive this logic or consistency doesn't matter to you and you'll use any excuse to criticize Isreal.

[-] Beetlejuice001@lemmy.wtf 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

You’re simply arguing in bad faith and dishonesty

Also you forgot to switch to your alt account

[-] VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

What are you blathering about?

[-] Beetlejuice001@lemmy.wtf 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Feign ignorance, move goalposts. I don’t debate liars

[-] VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

You made baseless accusations about alt accounts that doesn't even make sense and now me not knowing what you're trying to say is evidence I'm a liar? Are you OK? Or are you just deceptive and looking for an out on a debate because you realize that your bluster won't work and you have no facts or cohesive arguments?

this post was submitted on 13 May 2024
272 points (83.8% liked)

World News

38492 readers
3125 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world

Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
quinten@lemmy.world
NewsAutoMod@lemmy.world
jordanlund@lemmy.world
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
little_cow@lemmy.world
lemmyAtom@lemmy.world
FlyingSquid@lemmy.world