377
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Technus@lemmy.zip 18 points 2 months ago

The Core Ultra chips, like the Ryzen 7040-series chips, also include a neural processing unit (NPU) that can be used to accelerate some AI workloads. But both NPUs fall far short of the performance required for Recall and other locally accelerated AI features coming to Windows 11 24H2 later this year;

Why even waste the fucking space on the die then?

[-] tedu@azorius.net 35 points 2 months ago
[-] Technus@lemmy.zip 21 points 2 months ago

I sure as hell don't, but it seems extra pointless when it can't even run the workloads it was designed for.

[-] tedu@azorius.net 6 points 2 months ago

I'm sure it still works in photoshop or whatever, just not the windows stuff.

[-] fif-t@kbin.social 25 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Because the NPUs were designed and built and included long before Windows 11's AI features were announced?

If I recall correctly, it typically takes about 4 years for a CPU to go from design to distribution.

[-] Technus@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago

Meteor Lake was taped out in May 2021 and launched in December 2023. Still much slower than the pace of LLM development, to be fair. It seems more like an "if you build it, they will come" approach. But that's also how we got stuck with (for most consumer purposes) useless tensor cores on our GPUs. Does anyone even give a shit about raytracing/DLSS anymore?

It actually sounds like Microsoft is betraying Intel for Qualcomm, since their upcoming processor in the new Surface tablet is the only one that actually meets the requirements. So it looks like Microsoft doesn't give two shits about supporting existing hardware either way.

[-] iopq@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Tensor cores can be used to play chess, generate images, do realistic text to speech, do noise cancellation, content-aware fill, etc.

They are only useless to you and other people with no imagination

[-] Technus@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 months ago

Chess engines have outplayed humans for thirty years, and they didn't need teraflops of computing power to do it.

Generative AI is actively harmful to the environment, slowing the phase-out of coal in the US and guzzling billions of gallons of water. It's likely going to kill jobs and it's already filling the internet and the academic world with garbage. It's also likely a bubble that will burst before long, potentially bringing the economy down with it.

I'll give you noise cancellation and text-to-speech, that's pretty cool.

But personally, I'd rather have more CUDA cores.

[-] Jrockwar@feddit.uk 1 points 2 months ago

That middle paragraph is very misleading. It's Generative AI as a service that is actively harmful to the environment. Having a 15 W chip to do tasks like erasing objects from a photo is not any more harmful to the environment than a GPU that uses 15W. In fact, NPUs can be more efficient at some tasks than GPUs.

The problem is opening your phone/browser, and being able to call on demand GPT-4 to wake up a cluster of 128 Nvidia A100s operating at around 300-400W each. That's 51.2 kW.

Now you can draw some positives and negatives from that figure, such as

  • Given that an iPhone 15 Pro's A17 has a thermal design power of 8 W, GPT-4 on the server is about 6400 more energy intensive than anything you can do on an iPhone. 10 seconds of GPT need a similar amount of energy to an iPhone 15 Pro operating flat out at maximum power for 18 hours. Now in those 10 seconds, OpenAI says they "handle multiple user queries simultaneously", but still - we're feeding the machine.
  • 51.2 kW is also roughly how much power a large SUV needs to roll at constant speed on a motorway. Each of those large clusters uses a similar amount of energy to a single 7-seater SUV, but serving many users at the same time. Plus unlike cars, a large portion of their energy usage comes from renewables. So yes, I agree that it's a significant impact but largely overrepresented and we have bigger fish to fry; personal transport is a way bigger issue.
[-] iopq@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

I don't need to outplay humans, I need to see the optimal line to analyze it. Chess is still not solved, so Leela Zero is still helpful because it's giving better advice than older engines. Even Stockfish went neural network, but a smaller one that reads deeper. They still can't tell us if the game from the start ends in a draw like checkers.

Killing jobs is good. It's already freeing people from having to write things like promotional emails. Maybe they are sad they don't have a job anymore, but unemployment if 4%, hardly difficult to get a different one. It's not an important job anyway, I wouldn't feel creative to write about a labor day sale or whatever

[-] ozymandias117@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I’m so curious to see how a Qualcomm gambit plays out for Microsoft.

With the ethos at Qualcomm being support a chip for 1 year, then move on, I have trouble believing they’ll update the drivers for a major windows release

Google browbeat them for nearly 10 years, and then ended up going with the majority Samsung designed chip called Tensor just to compete against Apple in years of updates

[-] cyrus@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 months ago

NPUs existed before recall and have other uses apart from that.

this post was submitted on 30 May 2024
377 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

57273 readers
4982 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS