this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2024
1477 points (97.9% liked)

People Twitter

7400 readers
2533 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How is making a picture of me as an astronaut "dystopian"?

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 48 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The same technology can be used for widespread, low-cost, highly convincing misinformation and propaganda campaigns

[–] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

The moon landing wasn't faked, but I was there instead of Neil Armstrong. See these pics?

[–] SwingingKoala@discuss.tchncs.de -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah yes, the world was so much better when misinformation and propaganda could only be spread by well funded entities!

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You think the world will be better when literally anyone can create convincing misinformation and propaganda? Personally I prefer when that power is limited, even if there are still powerful entities that can do it

[–] SwingingKoala@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think everything gets better when it's less centralized. What does this "misinformation and propaganda" actually attack? A system so weak that it can't be defended against lies?

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think everything gets better when it's less centralized

Would it be better if everyone had access to nuclear weapons? Or biohazards?

Some things in this world, the fewer people that have access to them, the better. In a perfect world, we might have nobody have access to those things, but I'll settle for few rather than many.

[–] SwingingKoala@discuss.tchncs.de -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Would it be better if everyone had access to nuclear weapons?

I know this one, this is a https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man

Anyway, I think it would be better if a SINGLE PERSON couldn't launch nukes, decentralization would absolutely be better.

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

It's not a straw man. My point was that some things should not be completely democratized and have zero barrier to entry. You need a license to drive a car or buy a gun (in the civilized parts of the world anyway), so why should you be able to mass produce psychological warfare materials to sow disinformation without any friction or barrier to entry?

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago

Uses tons of energy which could ironically be used to get you to space for real (a lot more energy but at least you get a real experience).