18
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023
18 points (90.9% liked)
No Stupid Questions
2174 readers
5 users here now
There is no such thing as a Stupid Question!
Don't be embarrassed of your curiosity; everyone has questions that they may feel uncomfortable asking certain people, so this place gives you a nice area not to be judged about asking it. Everyone here is willing to help.
- ex. How do I change oil
- ex. How to tie shoes
- ex. Can you cry underwater?
Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca still apply!
Thanks for reading all of this, even if you didn't read all of this, and your eye started somewhere else, have a watermelon slice ๐.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Technically OP and the guy doing the job did enter into contract with each other, just a verbal one. This type of law is centuries old.
While that is true, the verbal contract stipulated non-monetary compensation on job completion. Job was never completed, so the contract was never fulfilled, and compensation is not owed. This is why repair depots have a minimum charge for technician time laid out in their pricing.
He agreed to give him one of the items...
If he fucked up all three and now wants paid, give him on of the now nonrepairable ones and call it a day
According to this post, the payment was arranged to be if the soldering job was done. The post then goes on to say that not only did he not solder the parts, he damaged them so they cannot be soldered by anyone else.
The other person did not fulfill his part of the agreement, so he has no right to the compensation.
If he fucked them up so bad no one can fix them...
What's the difference if OP gives him one?
Well, it's irrelevant to the question at hand, completely, but if we're talking about random unrelated shit, the here we go.
The difference is the worker is either an imbecile who dishonestly represented himself, or a dishonest scammer. Neither deserve anything; and why is that so hard to understand?
Because if OP is telling the truth, all three are no worthless.
So it literally doesn't matter if he gives him one.
I can only say this so many ways. I'm sorry I can't make it any simpler.
It does matter. You're promoting that doing a shitty job and poorly representing yourself deserves a reward, encouraging further shitty behaviour towards yourself and other people.
OP shouldn't give them anything, especially if @fsxylo@sh.itjust.works is right and the boards still have value.
Because the person is demanding monetary compensation, not demanding one of the broken items. But also, he might be aiming to try to keep all 3 of them as a "compromise" as they might not be as broken as he is representing them to be.