798
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] lowleveldata@programming.dev 59 points 2 weeks ago

I don't think that's how the where clause works

[-] Anafabula@discuss.tchncs.de 75 points 2 weeks ago

The original didn't have the where clause. Post by Seth Rosen on X/Twitter: Them: Can you just quickly pull this data for me? Me: Sure, let me just: SELECT * FROM some_ideal_clean_and_pristine.table_that_you_think_exists

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 24 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, that's more appropriate for a WHEN clause or possibly even a WHOM

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago

There's a WHOM keyword in SQL?

[-] Dendie@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago

Hopefully they'll one day allow WHENCE as an alias of FROM

[-] Hupf@feddit.de 15 points 2 weeks ago

I'm still waiting for the WHY clause

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Just chuck an =1 at the end, bam

this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2024
798 points (98.7% liked)

Programmer Humor

31251 readers
1195 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS