this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2024
117 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13955 readers
731 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net
MiraculousMM@hexbear.net
Nakoichi@hexbear.net
corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net
PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net
ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net
EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net
sweet_pecan@hexbear.net
a_little_red_rat@hexbear.net
khizuo@hexbear.net
gaystyleJoker@hexbear.net
thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net
context@hexbear.net
Infamousblt@hexbear.net
Sulvy@hexbear.net
117
Fascism and Falsifying Science, Name a more Iconic Duo (hexbear.net)
submitted 1 year ago by OutrageousHairdo@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
11 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] radiofreeval@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How often do meta analyses get peer review? I was under the impression that it is relatively common for meta analyses to not be peer reviewed because no new studies are being conducted.

[โ€“] ButtBidet@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago

Feck my effort comment didn't post.

Tldr: meta analysis get peer reviewed like any sort of study.