108
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

Does this count as a world war yet?

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Its possible the keg is done being packed and we're watching the fuse dwindle

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Do we know the locations of all Austro-Hungarian princes?

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

My bets have been on Taiwan being the flashpoint for well over a year now. Standing firm.

And my bet is and has been "before Christmas of 2024."

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Especially if there's "voting irregularities" or Trump wins outright. The Chinese would definitely take advantage of the confusion.

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I thought about that for a long time, and, honestly, it seems that Russia may have stolen China’s thunder there by invading Ukraine. As a result, the whole world (mostly) super-hates and has united against Russia with untold billions of weapons and aid to Ukraine.

What’s China to think of their Taiwan plan, now? Well, I think it’s obvious by watching what they’re doing, what they’ve been doing.

Although they’ve become more aggressive in the South China Sea, what with building all their fake islands and atolls in order to claim some sovereignty to the waters. But most of what they’re doing merely amounts to harassment and bullying of surrounding nations. And while there’s been a good amount of somewhat-incendiary talk re: China’s intentions towards Taiwan, they’ve actually done very little to accomplish that goal, as of late. They’re being careful, weighing their options, and proceeding slowly but surely.

Will Taiwan become the next place invaded? A new flashpoint? I don’t think so, or, at least, not for a while. The Ukraine War, Russia’s almost-collapsed economy, and their need for aid of all kinds has put China into an uncomfortable position, and they seem to be reprioritizing. Also, Taiwan has had a defense buildup for several years, and they’re far more capable of defending themselves than before.

If China makes any serious move against Taiwan, IMO, it will be a while from now.

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Idk. We've choked China out of AI supremacy. All of our mega GDP makers rely heavily on TSMC. Heavily.

I mean, entirely.

Like Biden throwing billions at chip manufacturers. Tensions in the South China Sea are ridiculous. The stakes have never been higher, and it's right in what they see as their back yard. Taking down TSMC cripples the US economy, causes a worldwide kerfuffle (especially with tensions from Russia/Ukraine, Israel/Palestine, Israel/Iran, US/Israel, US/Ukraine, US/Iran relationships.

I get what you mean that you've been thinking that for a decade. Ive been seeing it for as long. But it's gotten real with the AI bubble and tech sanctions. If it doesn't burst before 2030, there's no way China doesn't act. Frankly, I'm betting on less than 6 months.

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

All of China’s actions that you have described, I see as a dissipation of the united effort against Taiwan. Like I said, I’m not saying it won’t happen, I’m just saying it won’t happen really soon. China actually gives a huge shit about their international reputation. And they don’t want to that damaged fighting a war they can’t win. They will wait to move on Taiwan until they can be reasonably assured of a victory. And that won’t happen anytime soon.

China is also quite adept at fighting economic wars (like the US), and that’s what they’re going to do with AI. Just with money and sanctions and diplomatic bullshittery.

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Id put money on it happening before 2031. Like lots of money.

But Xi outright told Biden he and to invade Taiwan. This year. Verbatim. I guess I'm saying he'll lose a lot of public respect. Not that that's as valued there as it is in the US, but it's still reflect globally very weak and that's just not what global superpowers do. They don't make clear threats empty.

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

2031? Maybe. If the Ukraine war ends soon, it would give them a couple of years before they started up their bullshit. So, yeah, maybe. (Edit 2) I’d say it’s much more likely of Russia walks away with favorable terms, even less likely should Russia end up with an embarrassing loss…

But the stuff with AI it’s not some thing they could win with their military. Not even by taking over Taiwan (which I’m not convinced they can). Economic pressure that they can weild certainly would be more likely to help them achieve their goals. It just takes a lot longer.

Edit:

They don't make clear threats empty.

Oh, yes they do. All the time. China is a lot more talk than they are action, and they always have been. That’s why I am skeptical about them invading Taiwan anytime soon.

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I put a hard barrier past 2030 because of the China Reunification thing. It's a big thing for Xi. If he doesn't attempt he'll look like a no-balls fearful leader, or something. Idk.

And I say 2024 because he balls'd up around Xmas 2023 and said, as I mentioned, verbatim, "We will invade Taiwan this (next) year"

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

You’re not wrong in your reasoning, I’m just more reserved in my speculation.

I guess we’ll just have to wait and see

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Agreed and same toward you. Apologies if I came off as dismissive.

I think we felt the same in probably 2022. I think the recent tech supremacy race and the weird things like the US ordering Apple closing up shop in China, ordering all US companies (Nvidia) to not sell them the good stuff, and the efforts to separate specifically Chinese nationals from US higher education programs that delve into high end tech stuff is... Telling. And then... Shit like this?!

I won't ignore the possibility of propaganda creating the divergence in where we probably agreed 2 years ago and where I am now. But I feel there's enough economic proof and to me, historically it's always seemed like money talks.

But I digress. Agree to disagree. I'll be happy if I'm wrong lol.

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It’s nice to be able to have a discussion where both people disagree politely.

Thanks for the pleasure!

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Most welcome, and you the same!

I've been looking at it through the lens of this obscure joke from an old David Cross standup back in like 2003. Sad how relevant some of it still is. Highly recommend the whole special. It's aged great. Not sure if that playlist is in the correct order, so... Tough sell. :)

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Good stuff, David Cross

[-] Triasha@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Then we got the leaks saying the Chinese Military is Fubared by corruption down to the warehouse workers.

Russia could at least limp into Donbas when their Kiev assault disintegrated. If China tries to invade Taiwan and their missiles don't launch, it will be a stupidly expensive, deadly, embarrassment. Just ships and planes littering the ocean floor.

Xhi needs to be confident that his navy won't get pulled into Taipei ports by tugboat like Russian Tanks in the cornfields.

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Xhi needs to be confident that his navy won't get pulled into Taipei ports by tugboat like Russian Tanks in the cornfields.

If you start following the news coming out of the tensions in the South China seas, you'll see that China is indeed confident despite the US's enormous presence/teaming up with Japan to protect Taiwan...

[-] Drusas@kbin.run 1 points 1 month ago

China starting it like that had been my firm suspicion for years, but after the past year or so, I've changed my mind. They still could be the ones to trigger it, but there are so many more players now. Russia could start it (or have already done so without us realizing it yet). Israel could start it. China could start it over island territories that they have no legitimate claim over--oh wait, that includes Taiwan.

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Strange time to change your mind about it...?

South China Seas have never been more piratey. It's basically a warzone already, inching closer to Taiwan every day.

By this I mean like... What're your regularish news sources? Because my radar flipped the other way.

[-] simplejack@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I’m still waiting for a star war.

this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2024
108 points (96.6% liked)

politics

18586 readers
4356 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS