497

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/17558715

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Piemanding@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 week ago

Yes, but that is Lithium-ion. These batteries are Sodium-ion which are better for the environment and can potentially be made a lot cheaper.. It's still pretty new technology so it's not really in any consumer products yet.

[-] schizoidman@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 week ago
[-] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 3 points 1 week ago

Yes, but you pretty much have to do a full battery test and pen test like the great Scott video because it is really a 60/40 of getting fake sodium ion batteries from Aliexpress ๐Ÿ˜…

[-] themurphy@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 week ago

Sodium batteries will not replace lithium in cars, as the density is too low.

It means the battery weighs more but contains less power.

For an EV, that wouldn't work, as the heavier the car is, the more power it uses.

With sodium you will probably half the range of the EV, which is already low.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 6 points 1 week ago

The newer sodium batteries are comparable to LFP batteries from a few years ago.

For medium distance commuter cars and inner city travel those things dont matter and will probably be outweighed by the cost savings, safety and reliability of sodium batteries. The main issue right now with getting EVs into more peoples hands is cost.

probably half the range of an EV

Many EVs have ~250 miles range. I need a quarter of that in usable winter range for my commute. If I could get an EV with 125 miles of advertised range (about half that in winter) for a third the price, I'd do it.

It's not going to replace my road tripping car, but it could replace my commuter, which needs very little range.

[-] DarkDarkHouse 1 points 1 week ago

There are some electric vehicles so far, which is promising.

[-] Cipher22@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

Economy of scale matters, so does practicality. Which one is generally lasting longer per number of charges and what's the long term viability of both given the time they were build and the available tech at that time? I totally understand the greater availability of sodium vs lithium. However, will it last? Last time I read much about it, reliability was weak, charge capacity over time dropped drastically, and failures were high. (It has been a couple of years, so things may be changing. )

Something new and shiney can be nifty, but past that, what is this? It seems like an expensive hood ornament that will rust in the rain. Lithium is expensive and toxic to mine, but so are all metals to some extent, and this has plenty.

It seems like it's buying something 25% off on a $100 thing that won't last well. Sure, you saved $25 once, but you're buying 3 of them in the same time frame.

[-] bastion@feddit.nl 9 points 1 week ago

Nah. Time to reread, sodium is absolutely a viable tech now.

[-] Piemanding@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

Yes. Last I saw they lasted for more charges and had similar capacity to lithium. It's been invested into so much because it is viable.

this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2024
497 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

55919 readers
2561 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS