102

Thank fuck. This man can go down in history as the savior of the Republic if he fucks off and endorses someone else.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Eh. If it takes 1 or 2 weeks, so be it. As things stand, we’re getting trump and America is gone.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Eh.

I think even with Biden it's close to a 50/50 shot of beating trump.

I just don't like those odds and don't understand why we're plowing ahead with two candidates no one really wants as president.

I just wish Biden and the DNC were taking this election seriously. This could be a walkin victory with AOC or even Whitimere.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

It's very difficult for ambitious people to admit that they're done. Once you reach the pinnacle, it's hard to give up, because the only way forward is down. LBJ is held up as an example, but it was difficult for him, too:

On Inauguration Day (January 20, 1969), Johnson saw Nixon sworn in, then got on the plane to fly back to Texas. When the front door of the plane closed, Johnson pulled out a cigarette—his first cigarette he had smoked since his heart attack in 1955. One of his daughters pulled it out of his mouth and said, "Daddy, what are you doing? You're going to kill yourself." He took it back and said, "I've now raised you, girls. I've now been President. Now it's my time!" From that point on, he went into a very self-destructive spiral.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyndon_B._Johnson

Consider how screwed up the SC is right now. Yes, a lot of that is due to Mitch McConnell and Lindsay Graham playing games, but it's also due in no small part to RBG not resigning when many told her she ought to. Now, it's quite clear that she was capable of the job at the time, and would only be stepping down for political expediency, so Obama could have named a younger replacement. If RBG had retired, and the court was less of a clusterfuck, we might not have appreciated how important that moment would have been.

It's hard enough to take the car keys away from Grandpa, it's harder to take the keys to power away.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

It’s hard enough to take the car keys away from Grandpa, it’s harder to take the keys to power away.

People aren't even really trying to take Biden's keys away...

They're just saying we're not letting him drive the kids to Country Kitchen Buffet anymore.

We don't know if there's going to be an accident this time, or ever.

It's just bad risk assessment to let him keep going to until an accident happens

Even if he beats trump, that doesn't mean he'll be a capable president at 85 when this next term is up

[-] JoShmoe@ani.social 7 points 1 month ago

You can’t honestly say that no one wants trump. There are actual die tards for him.

I wish AOC was willing to run for the presidency.

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

“die tards” lol.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Unfortunately I'm in a red state that only went D once in like 30-40 years, and that was for 08 Obama.

So I feel like I have a pretty good insight.

I haven't seen a single trump sign or even new bumper stickers this year. Which is crazy compared to the last two elections.

People wouldn't fucking shut up about him. This cycle? It honestly feels like it's not even am election year.

I wish AOC was willing to run for the presidency.

The only negative people have for her is she's the most progressive option. So I really think we need to start pushing for someone like Boots Riley so AOC isn't the furthest left people hear about.

Like, let's just get an actual communists name in the mix. Boots will never win, but he's charismatic, really good at getting his message across, and shit, I think he's still cool enough with Tom Morello that he'd jump at a VP chance.

Old heads know him from his rapping, he even had a song with Tupac.

Younger people might know him from writing/directing "Sorry to bother you".

But he also wrote directed "I'm a Virgo" and it shows just how fucking on point he is with messaging

https://youtu.be/lpagmvYZKRc?si=T7QhO7iom14CnA7h&t=80

He might not ever win an election. But he makes AOC look like the centerline moderate shed be in any other first world countey.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 month ago

The problem is that I don't think the odds are appreciably better with any other Democrat.

[-] retrospectology@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Even Harris is polling better, and doesn't have the pro-genocide baggage. If polls are to be believed she has a better chance of beating out Trump, especially among key demographics of black voters and suburban women, and if she has a better chance then I feel like basically anyone does.

[-] Ranvier@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

https://www.newsweek.com/gretchen-whither-chances-beating-trump-poll-1919211

That's my concern too. Harris was closest at about the same percent as Biden. Though it did increase the amount of people who would say they're not sure when compared to the Biden Trump race. It's possible a new candidate might have some wiggle room to convince more swing voters. So I think there's an argument to be made that some of the potential replacements have a higher ceiling than Biden does that they might get to even if they start at a lower polling basis. I would feel a lot better about a switch if someone was actually polling better than Biden already though.

https://www.vox.com/2024-elections/358559/biden-harris-whitmer-newsom-shapiro-buttigieg-alternative-nomination-candidate-2024

These ones were earlier from February 2024, and though it was only in a single poll, the only person who recorded a higher percent than Biden in a poll was fucking Joe Manchin, ugh.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

~69% of voters neither approve nor disapprove of Whitmere fro president.

She's the best shot we have that the DNC would appoint.

And I have zero reason to doubt shed beat Trump. Plus as the recent victim for a kidnapping plot, she's going to take the risk of fascists seriously.

Among the full US public, Biden’s favorability rating stands at just 34%, with 58% viewing him unfavorably. And while many of the Democratic names bandied about as possible replacements for Biden are less widely disliked, none would start with more public goodwill – instead, they are less well known. Harris has the widest recognition – and is also deeply underwater, with a 29% favorability rating, 49% rating her unfavorably, and 22% saying they have no opinion or haven’t heard of her. Roughly half of the public has no opinion on Buttigieg (50%) and Newsom (48%), with about two-thirds (69%) offering no opinion of Whitmer.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/02/politics/cnn-poll-post-debate/index.html

She's not beating trump in head to head polls yet. But if she was the candidate she likely would be. And I think that head to head poll is from Data for Progress anyways, which has a whole bunch of issues.

But it's important to remember that literally anyone's numbers would go up in head to head polls if they had an active campaign and the DNC supporting them.

Biden already has that, it's as good as it's going to get for him, because the more voters interact with him, the worse his numbers get.

[-] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 3 points 1 month ago

and don’t understand why we’re plowing ahead with two candidates no one really wants as president.

That's easy to understand; it's because the two primary political parties run the show from bottom to top and they both managed to make serious political miscalculations at the same time.

Democrats screwed up by repressing all their younger members for the past 15-20 years in favor of their established power brokers; now their cupboard is bare right when they need it most. The Republicans miscalculated by assembling behind Trump in the first place and then they did it again by re-assembling behind Trump.

If this country's politics weren't being totally controlled by Ds and Rs now is when a 3rd Party Candidate (Libertarian, Green, etc) could gain some serious traction.

this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024
102 points (73.4% liked)

politics

18586 readers
4390 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS