118
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024
118 points (94.7% liked)
Games
15867 readers
558 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
If you were still paying for microtransactions for a SEVENTEEN YEAR OLD GAME, congratulations, you played yourself.
I've managed to take part in this boycott ever since I stopped playing TF2 in 2008. It's not hard, and the fact that this even has to be suggested is pathetic.
How many games have microtransactions that disappear within a few years? Seems like team fortress 2 is the one place where you can buy an in-game item and still have access to it over a decade later. Not many games can say that.
I don't get the hate for cosmetic microtransaction, that's the best kind.
The problem with cosmetic microtransactions is that it gives the creators a monetary incentive to make sure nothing you can earn in the game is as appealing as the microtransaction items, or that their availability (in cases where you can earn the same items in-game) are low enough that you'll never reasonably earn what you want.
You can say 'Cosmetics don't matter!' but the astronomical sales of cosmetic items pretty much proves that to the majority of players, that is not the case.
They also often intentionally create game mechanics specifically to ensure that players who aren't paying see the better-looking players who did pay.
Is it a majority of players or a minority that pays unsustainable sums?
Play a match of Valorant. EVERYONE has skins. There are whales that buy every $100 bundle sure, but even the regular players often end up buying a $20 skin or $50 bundle pretty often.
No, thank you. No Chinese spyware on my home PC.
The problem with cosmetic items is the payout % to the artist. It's so fucking low, I have no idea why artists work so hard for it.
They should make 2 versions. One microtransaction and one slightly cooler obtainable in game.
Obviously, paying customers would want to look and feel premium. Plenty of events and rewards provide content that look good.
It's the desire to look different that drives the high volume cosmetic sales. If someone can't afford it, they don't lose out on content but still able to access a full-fledged game.
That's a great thing, not possible without microtransactions.