71
Linux's DRM Panic "Screen of Death" Sees Patches For QR Code Error Messages
(www.phoronix.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2024
71 points (100.0% liked)
Linux
7575 readers
97 users here now
Welcome to c/linux!
Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!
Rules:
-
Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.
-
Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.
-
Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.
-
No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.
-
No NSFW adult content
-
Follow general lemmy guidelines.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
This seems like a regression. We use logs to tell us what's wrong for a reason.
Why would I want to scan a qr code on my phone to read shit on a tiny screen you could've just printed on the computers display?
Also this is gonna play out great in secured environments where cameras are a no no.
Leave shit like this to the fuckers with no taste at Microsoft. Kernel panics are supposed to be verbose.
Because getting it off your crashed computer's display and into text format, so it can be grepped or posted in a bug report, is a cumbersome task. (OCR tools are not ubiquitous, convenient, or reliable.) And an impossible task when half the crash dump scrolled off the screen.
It's optional.
That's how I felt when the BSoD screen was introduced, but with this new way of using it to reliably deliver more information than ever before, it's starting to look useful.
i love how this is like a sentence for sentence uptranslation of my comment. thank you for sharing :)
(non industry person, heads up)
sometimes u can’t access logs easily, no? especially if something is real busted
phone usually stays on when ur trying to reboot and finick with stuff, whereas computer screen turns off. other alternative to keep a persistent copy i guess would be to print it out but that’s not eco friendly
can’t speak to this but hopefully u can disable it?
that qr code is massive, looks pretty verbose to me. idk i like moves to make linux more accessible. people are always calling for the ‘year of the linux desktop’ and then turn around and do backlash to try to keep things obfuscated and unfriendly to the average human, especially, again, where u can probably disable it if wanted. idk i guess im pretty critical of that tendency.
To be fair to both of these groups in my impression those are usually separate people. People definitely have different visions for what good design is here.
The thing that strikes me as bad is when Unix conservatives (for lack of a better term) actively resists features to support use in modern, bit-mapped graphics as opposed to 70’s teletype terminals etc. But that’s just a terrible position, not necessarily hypocrisy, assuming they don’t care about Linux as the kernel in a desktop operating system for people whose hobby is not configuring their computer.
this does explain quite a bit, thanks for the clarification
these things should be opt-in, not opt-out. Opt-out is the way Microsoftism get (and have already gotten into) Linux.
looks like its opt in good news
From the article: