¿Lo qué? Tener una idea original cuesta dinero y más encima tienes que evaluar estudios de mercado y factibilidad cinematográfica que cuestan más dinero. ¿Acaso quieres privar a los accionistas de quedarse con ese dinero? Cuando en vez de eso puedes lanzar el 15vo refrito de Volver al Futuro.
The blockchain is always a scam.
, and no company is going to go to jail for you.
Assnuts. They'd not go to jail anyway. Companies pay fines at most, you might arrest a specific legal representative (one of 123456789 employees of the company) for three days while the lawyer comes up with better papers, but companies never, meaningfully go to jail.
¿Tiene que ser no-gecko también o solamente no-firefox? Podrías probar con un release de Seamonkey.
Heck, the way people are being nowadays, it's "read" that's doing the heavy lifting.
Perdón error de contexto, me refería a los Creacionistas, no Conservacionistas (ni Conservadores). Ámbitos (y niveles de fundamentalismo) completamente diferentes.
Dicho eso, uno de los mayores peligros del conservatismo en la política es justamente que se cuelgan del fanatismo del conservacionismo y del creacionismo bajo la arenga de que es para "proteger la tradición", o la pureza de raza, o cual sea la vaina del momento.
Still better investment than putting your money in, say, Felon or Trump stuff.
¿Y qué tan específico es lo que tienes que construir como para que te estés dando la gran paja de hacerlo (incluso si tomas el camino de compilar cruzado desde amd64, es un cacho) en comparación con simplemente buscar una alternativa que esté mantenida en i?86 o simplemente una alternativa más vieja de la era donde 32-bit reinaba?
To support development financially, the first best way is to donate to the devs, for which people have already posted links.
The second best alternative, in particular for the people who are butthurt about the devs having their given political position yet hypocritically continue to fund or promote things like iPhone child labor, Amazon, Walmart, corporate backing of Israel military, or US taxes, would be to financially support the maintainers of the Lemmy instance(s) you are in. Most instance have their own "donate" / "support" link somewhere. Check yours.
(another advantage to supporting the instance you are in is that you would, usually, experience sooner or larger improvements in return for your investment. Better storage or network plan for your instance = better speed or uptime for posting lolcats)
Third best way, probably, is to finance public or state-level advocacy for Lemmy and/or Fediverse general. Alas I don't know what if any organizations exist there nor how are they taking money (and report on its usage).
Ah, ¿tiene entonces usted la suerte de tener un gato que lo vigila?
Inspired by a comment in this r/cpp thread on how, well, hidden friends don't seem to be reflectable; this in the context of C++26 reflection.
(let's see if that works)
So basically what I'm wondering is if it is possible to run multiple instances of the fontserver (fontconfig?) in parallel for the same desktop session. Then being able to fire up programs connected to either fontserver.
This is Linux so I sorta just assume it is, but better to invoke the Power of Ackshually.
What for, one would ask?
Well, the example use case I'm seeing this for is actually to aid in anti-browser fingerprinting.
As a distro user, one ends up with hundreds of fonts installed. Math, doramas, emojis... Noto by itself adds 80 entries to my LO listing.
Normally that's not an issue, but when in eg.: Firefox, it is. Having enabled browser.use_document_fonts, all those fonts are visible for the browser even with font-visibility measures applied. Have tested it with online benchmarks such as amiunique and browserleaks. What's worse, "use document fonts" is a global setting instead of a site-specific setting, so I can't really fine-tune a session for that -- tho I've already filed Mozilla about that.
But I don't want to uninstall the fonts, I'm using them! I just want for spies to not see them.
So I thought.
Fonts are controlled by a fontserver ("fontconfig").
What if I could have a second fontserver running in my session? One that has a more "normal" set of fonts enabled, such as say the baseline set + language pack fonts for Fedora or Ubuntu, and then Roboto or Noto for good measure. Then I could launch my browser such that it connects to that second fontserver instance...
# example potential code, donut steel
env FONTSERVER_SOCKET=unix:///var/run/fontserver2.sock firefox
And bam! fingerprinters wont be able to see beyond, while I can freely alt-tab to LO and my "handwritten" document.
So yeah. Correct me that this can't be done. Let's do it.
I've always found C++'s "trend" of handling normal or non-exceptional system errors with exceptions lackluster (and I'm being charitable). Overall trimming things down to (basically) passing around a couple integers and telling the user to check their manual is much better, much less error prone, and much more efficient and deterministic.
(But hey at least I don't use Tailwind nor any of those MBA hallucination scams.)
publicado de forma cruzada desde: https://lemmy.ml/post/33648313
Just one example: General Stroessner
El meme:
Latinoamérica: Logramos crear gobiernos de izquierda para detener la explotación y asegurar derechos humanos básicos. ¡Ojalá no haya intervencionismo extranjero!
La CIA:
publicado de forma cruzada desde: https://gregtech.eu/post/6514020
!iso8601@lemmy.sdf.org gang, rise up
Por tener que bajar en Mininco y esperar bus tres horas 🎵