lambalicious

joined 2 years ago
[–] lambalicious 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

As an ESL, I thought that was "narcs"?

[–] lambalicious 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lembipie. What else?

(And why does this particular subset need a name, anyway? The plus combo is easier to get the point across with)

[–] lambalicious 4 points 3 days ago
[–] lambalicious 1 points 4 days ago

Depends on timezone... it's already May here.

[–] lambalicious 1 points 4 days ago

Four or five entire questions on AI? That's 20% of the survey! Mighty suspicious, I have to say. In any event, gave them a piece of my mind on the subject.

[–] lambalicious 1 points 4 days ago

, and the worst thing he does is

...to farm dead veterans and turn them into cyborg soldiers solely so that he can antagonize Mark and (fail to) make a point about how "above things" he has to be?

Oh and he tapped the water supply of the entire country. Possibly the entire world, who knows. Anyone who's read Batman "protocol" stories how where do those "preparations" lead and how.

That and teleporter abuse, but he’s earned that.

At the cost that has been calculated by the fanbase, in the apparent economy of cities being destroyed on the double? Okay that one I might be willing to concede.

[–] lambalicious 1 points 4 days ago

What? That was the best part– no wait, the ONLY GOOD PART, of the second prequel!

[–] lambalicious 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

La sacó demasiado barata Colo Colo. Hubiera sido mi decisión, la gracia les habría salido harto penosa la verdad. "Ejemplizadora" (EDIT: "ejemplificadora") y de ahí pa'rriba.

Pero bueno. Supongo que B&N saldrá pasado mañana (no el 1ero de Mayo... aunque conociendo a esos charchas...) a lloriquear en las noticias que van a apelar el fallo, y no hacer ni una mueca negativa ante mención de barras bravas.

[–] lambalicious 1 points 5 days ago

, but then he realizes what a bad idea it is and changes to Cap’s side

No he doesn't; he just realizes that it personally inconveniences him because it gets his (only) moral tether killed, and decides to walk back that support to restore his own benefit, at the cost and harm of everyone else.

[–] lambalicious 8 points 5 days ago (8 children)

if you have to list more than one thing per thing the landscape may not be there for a full replacement

And it would be even less if there had to be only one thing per thing.

One of the strengths of the FOSS metacommunity is the variety in designs and results. Big Corpo abuses economies of scale and locks you in with a "one shoe fits all solution" because they under the table also chisel and file your feet; FOSS has (largely) no such restrictions so they can afford to try things and see what results and, more importantly, what evolves. Not everything has to be a copy of corporate, and we shouldn't act as if it had to be.

[–] lambalicious 5 points 5 days ago

yanquis: "Noooo Chile malo nos hacen quedar mal con nuestra seguridad..."

También yanquis: > invita periodistas a chats de guerra

yanquis: "...y no combaten la piratería"

También yanquis: > piratea "yOu wOuLdNT DowNLoAd a CaR"

108
ISO 8601 ftw rule (gregtech.eu)
submitted 2 months ago by lambalicious to c/iso8601
 

publicado de forma cruzada desde: https://gregtech.eu/post/6514020

!iso8601@lemmy.sdf.org gang, rise up

 

(Only half joking with the poll options, too.)

 

Aquí en la mejor instancia de feddit celebramos el largo de Chile. Y en otras instancias, parece que también.

 

RFC 3339, the "alternative" to ISO 8061, was extended to RFC 9957, which also allows adding interpretative tags.

Sounds like unnecessary complexification to me. What is wrong if anything with "2024-04-26"?

 

Today in our newest take on "older technology is better": why NAT rules!

 

Hablando en serio.

Todo el mundo habla de lo mal que está la educación, que los profesores, que los estudiantes y blah blah, y no estoy en desacuerdo que hay cosas ahí que están mal. Me podría mandar un ensayo en cómo no puede ser que una manga de pendejos de 12 vengan a amenazar a un profe en la sala. O que las salas en cuestión no deberían tener más de 20 alumnos.

Pero igual hay temas de método y de material de fondo, como este.

¿Por qué no es más común en Chile enseñar las cosas de una manera más atractiva? O al menos, más inmersiva que "copie el texto aprobado 131 veces". O, no sé, cuando yo estaba en la media la manera que nos enseñaban castellano era penca (ni qué decir del inglés) pero pucha que aprendimos harto el un (1) (uno) semestre que nos hicieron escribir y ejecutar una obra de teatro.

 

Hey everyone I was wondering how do you spice up your cursors, icons, themes, etc., In particular for desktop environments such as XFCE, Mate. Are there any good repositories to use?

I've taken a look at a number of apparently cloned sites like "xfce-look.org", "kde-look.org", "gnome-look.org", but while they seem to show a wide offering of themes, it seems downloading from them is blocked via uBO since it reports a "fp2" fingerprinting script without which apparently downloads are not enabled. Are those sites trustworthy? They seem to be associated to a "OpenDesktop" initiative of which the only reputation I can find is that they were added to EasyList Privacy blocklist.

If there are other alternative hubs or repos from which to theme a distro (as agnostically as posisble) that'd be welcome info.

Cheers. Thanks. Et cetera.

 

publicado de forma cruzada desde: https://lemmy.world/post/9470764

  • ISO 8601 is paywalled
  • RFC allows a space instead of a T (e.g. 2020-12-09 16:09:...) which is nicer to read.
 

I've seen the Wikipedia article on year 9 doesn't mention anything of relevance happening during November. Closest thing seems to be September. Since people around have spent a few years making lots of ruckus about how the date with "9, 11" has some sort of importance as a date, I was wondering if I'm missing something here.

 

Basically title. 2019 edition of the Standard denotes the "T" prefix to time as mandatory (except in "unambiguous contexts"):

01:29:59 is now actually T01:29:59, with the former form now designated as an alternative

But date does not have a "D" prefix, not even in "ambiguous contexts".

1973-09-11 never needs to be something like eg.: D1973-09-11

Anyone know the reasoning behind this change and what is the intended use? The only time-only format with separators that I can think would be undecidable in ambiguous contexts would be hh:mm which I guess could be mistaken for bible verses?

 

En English pero bueno, qué se le va a hacer.

Hoy que se unen las coyunturas de los 50 años del golpe y la dictadura, el cambio climático, y los socavones de los edificios en Valpo, este artículo se ve particularmente relevante.

Si no hubiera sido por el golpe, quién sabe, Long Chile AU o tal vez podríamos haber sido una potencia mundial de la sustentabilidad climática.

view more: next ›