416
Antinatalism Rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 month ago

It's the other side of the same coin. They both argue about the well-being/bad-being of hypothetical humans. It's bogus, either way.

[-] F04118F@feddit.nl 1 points 1 month ago

I think you make a great point. Have you read about the problems with "person-affecting views"? It's admittedly a bit harder to grasp, but doesn't seem less problematic to me.

[-] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago
[-] F04118F@feddit.nl 1 points 1 month ago

Highly recommend. It's easy to dismiss as weird bullshit initially but enlightening when you put in the effort to understand.

To be clear, I am no longer strongly convinced of or against person affecting views and take both seriously.

This is a good starting point:

https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/c6ZYCpq2L46AxSJNy/my-favourite-arguments-against-person-affecting-views

[-] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 month ago

I would prefer not to

  • Slavoy Zizek
[-] F04118F@feddit.nl 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'm not sure if I should feel sad for you, or envious. To be so certain of your own point of view and take pride in not taking other ideas seriously. It must give some sense of calm but at the same time, you miss out on so much. I won't ask or recommend you anything though, I read the thing. Enjoy your wall staring. Let's hope it will make the world a better place.

[-] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Dude, get off your high horse. If I read every little thing some rando on the internet threw at me, I would never leave the toilet!

I don't find these EA thought experiments interesting. That's no reason to try to shame me for it.

I made a decision, please respect that.

[-] F04118F@feddit.nl 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'm sorry, it seems I misinterpreted your comment by a lot.

I read about Slavoy Zizek's philosophy and ideas and in that context, "I would prefer not to" is the ultimate rejection of capitalism and some sort of super-resistance, if I understood correctly.

I thought you meant to dismiss the whole group of ideas without reading them based on how convinced you are of Zizek's ideas, and were blaming me for "supporting the system". That's why I reacted so aggressively, I'm sorry, that was bullshit.

P.S. I do tend to get stuck in these rabbit holes of philosophy.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2024
416 points (99.3% liked)

196

16042 readers
2446 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS