16
Congress apparently feels a need for “reaffirmation” of SLS rocket
(arstechnica.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
16 points (94.4% liked)
Spaceflight
602 readers
12 users here now
Your one-stop shop for spaceflight news and discussion.
All serious posts related to spaceflight are welcome! JAXA, ISRO, CNSA, Roscosmos, ULA, RocketLab, Firefly, Relativity, Blue Origin, etc. (Arca and Pythom, if you must).
Other related space communities:
- !rocketlab@lemmy.nz
- !curiosityrover@lemmy.world
- !perseverancerover@lemmy.world
- !esa@feddit.nl
- !nasa@lemmy.world
- !spacex@sh.itjust.works
- !astronomy@mander.xyz
- !space@lemmy.world
Related meme community:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
That really seems like it should be Boeing's job. Prove to NASA why they should use it for high energy probes. Prove the value for heavy GEO sats. Calculate out cost savings from a higher launch rate and bid on contracts based on that.
None of those trades close, but it still shouldn't be NASA's job to say so.
Boeing can’t currently build airplanes to spec and you want them to more involved with building rockets? Do you just not like astronauts or…?
Boeing is the prime contractor for SLS. That's why I brought them up.