16
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 13 points 1 month ago

the sls is a giant corporate welfare program and nothing more. that said, its better than spending that money on human killing devices and pretending its 'defense'

[-] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

senate launch system

[-] burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

SLS and Orion are really impressive from a political standpoint.

Congress shouldn't design rockets.

[-] burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That really seems like it should be Boeing's job. Prove to NASA why they should use it for high energy probes. Prove the value for heavy GEO sats. Calculate out cost savings from a higher launch rate and bid on contracts based on that.

None of those trades close, but it still shouldn't be NASA's job to say so.

[-] teft@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Boeing can’t currently build airplanes to spec and you want them to more involved with building rockets? Do you just not like astronauts or…?

[-] burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

Boeing is the prime contractor for SLS. That's why I brought them up.

this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
16 points (94.4% liked)

Spaceflight

531 readers
85 users here now

Your one-stop shop for spaceflight news and discussion.

All serious posts related to spaceflight are welcome! JAXA, ISRO, CNSA, Roscosmos, ULA, RocketLab, Firefly, Relativity, Blue Origin, etc. (Arca and Pythom, if you must).

Other related space communities:

Please keep memes contained to !spaceflightmemes@sh.itjust.works

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS