this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024
38 points (91.3% liked)

Technology

3551 readers
477 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Influencer platform's controversial contest awarded prizes to three nonexistent people.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

rewarding beauty is fine. rewarding beauty in such a way that it has an impact—not only measurable, but significant—against the mental health of the public is not fine.

[–] Aux@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

rewarding intelligence is fine. rewarding intelligence in such a way that it has an impact—not only measurable, but significant—against the mental health of the public is not fine.

Let's stop this malicious practice of giving Nobel prizes!

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

as soon as there is evidence that nobel prizes cause mental health problems i will be saying this lol

[–] Aux@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's plenty of evidence that peer and family pressure during studying severely affects mental health of many and often leads to suicides.

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

ok excellent point i will now start calling for reform in academia. :) not sure if banning Nobel prizes is the most effective way but it’s an idea

also you made some really hateful comments earlier and i forgot to block you oopsie, take care ❤️

[–] Aux@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

A misogynist got offended, lol.

[–] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Whether we reward it or not, as long as there is someone people can compare themselves to, it's going to affect their mental health. Social media itself is a beauty competition, and the reward is attention. We tend to compare up, not down, so it doesn't really matter how beautiful or rich someone is—there's always someone doing even better who makes us feel insufficient.

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

nope, not at all. having someone to look up to is not the same as a barage of media and advertising soaked with the intent of amplifying and capitalizing off of body dissatisfaction and self hatred.

[–] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If Pixelfed were as popular as Instagram, it would have virtually the same effect on the mental health of young girls, especially. While an advertising-based business model does influence this, it's not the driving factor. Social comparison is in our genes, but never before have we been able to do it at this scale. This is guaranteed to have a negative effect on mental health. The issue however is not that social media is inherently bad; it's just incompatible with the way humans behave. It's like drugs.

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe -1 points 1 year ago

literally no lol. the advertising (more accurately, the profit-seeking) model is certainly the driving factor, supported by engagement-maximizing algorithms. and remember it’s not just social media i’m criticizing. it’s a much larger media structure including also the show this post is about, and the discussion is much older than instagram, reaching back decades. here, for example, is a study of media exposure and body dissatisfaction from 2003: 7 years before instagram.