339
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 18 points 4 months ago

I think that's largely a consequence of the 5e design in general. It doesn't leave a lot of room, natively, for exciting challenges from its monsters. You've got to go to third parties, like Colville's "action-oriented monsters", or other systems like PF2, to get that.

[-] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The main thing missing compared to the 3.x version that would hinder the flying archer strategy is its regeneration and needing to use Wish or Miracle to keep it dead. Trolls and Vampires have conditional regeneration, Zombies have Undead Fortitude that gives them a chance not to die when reduced to 0 HP, the concepts were there they just chose not to implement them.

[-] TheGreatDarkness@ttrpg.network 9 points 4 months ago

Fun fact, MCDM's Flee Mortals! book has its own stand-in for Tarrasque - Goxomoc. Fool's Gold: Into the Bellowing Wilds also has Dire Tarrasque

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I'm a little sad that that book took so long to arrive that I had gone from never even considering moving to another system (other than for some fun temporary one-shots & small campaigns to add variety) to basically not being able to imagine myself choosing to go back to D&D at all, between the time I paid for it and when it finally arrived 5 months ago. Because I really did love the idea of it when it was being Kickstarted.

[-] Shyfer@ttrpg.network 3 points 4 months ago

Same. The monsters are amazing, and would be a big boost to 5e, but I haven't been playing it as much lately.

this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2024
339 points (98.0% liked)

RPGMemes

10366 readers
492 users here now

Humor, jokes, memes about TTRPGs

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS