259
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by mac@programming.dev to c/programming@programming.dev
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] gedhrel@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Possibly the thing that was intended to be deployed was. What got pushed out was 40kB of all zeroes. Could've been corrupted some way down the CI chain.

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 2 points 3 months ago

Which definitely wouldn't have been a single developer's fault.

[-] gedhrel@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Developers aren't the ones at fault here.

[-] Miaou@jlai.lu 1 points 3 months ago

Not the most at fault, but if you sign off on a shitty process, you are still partially responsible

[-] gedhrel@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

That depends entirely on the ability to execute change. CTO is the role that should be driving this.

this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2024
259 points (95.1% liked)

Programming

17314 readers
244 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS