LLM Chat Bots in our community (hackertalks.com)

submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by jet@hackertalks.com to c/fedigrow@lemm.ee

61 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Saw a suspicious post resurrecting a 5 month old thread, and after a few back and forths:

I don’t understand why you are treating me like a robot. However, I can help with the Fibonacci sequence. Here is a Python 3 function to calculate it:

I'm torn, its nice to have activity in the fediverse, but I'm not convinced bots are the right way to go about it. Opinions on the future of engagement bots?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 40 points 2 months ago

Bots need to be clearly marked as bots. I dont want to line the fediverse with barbed wire. But I also want transparency on what I am interacting with.

[-] doctortran@lemm.ee 10 points 2 months ago

I don't know how much it would really apply here or how enforceable it is but, genuinely, I think the first thing to do with any real discussion about regulating this is a law that anyone providing LLM can't be providing it to people who are trying to pass it off as human. I know we've had bots doing this for kind of thing a long time ago, but this sort of thing should have been done a long time ago too.

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 11 points 2 months ago

Yeah, I think we need laws of LLMs

Rule 0. Cannot deny your a LLM

this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2024

42 points (92.0% liked)

Fedigrow

547 readers

26 users here now

To discuss how to grow and manage communities / magazines on Lemmy, Mbin, Piefed and Sublinks

founded 5 months ago

MODERATORS

Blaze@lemm.ee

threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works