I bet you one of the bastards has barbecue sauce on him
Negative - BBQ sauce is a tool of oppression - filled with insulin spiking sugar.
I bet you one of the bastards has barbecue sauce on him
Negative - BBQ sauce is a tool of oppression - filled with insulin spiking sugar.
attack the elite while we’re on that?
you mean the crypto-adventist agenda carriers? Sure, why not.
I’m hoping to find some actionable people and radicalise together
That is exactly what we want - fix modern chronic disease - fix the epidemic of type 2 diabetes. Join us in the insulin crusades!
i block politics on lemmy, its much nicer
Every FFQ calls that stuff meat.
hardly strong proof.
Yup, early days, but it isn't contradicted by observed data - which makes the mitochondrial metabolic theory of cancer interesting. There are a few (8 i think) ongoing glioblastoma studies being run independently of Seyfried in NZ I think - so I wait to see those results. the press-pulse protocol paper is being used in some AU studies at the moment as well.
The critique’s from the article I linked seem exactly as valid now as they were when it was written.
My main concern with that article is that it isn't peer reviewed, the author is no stranger to publishing papers (100+ i could find), so why not publish his critique?
I think part of the problem is his smoking gun - https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2014.2382 - didn't actually use a ketogenic diet - 60g a day of carbs isn't therapeutic levels of ketosis (i.e. many people wont be in ketosis at this level), and they measured with urine strips - in 2014!!! - that's crazy. so they couldn't compute the GKI, which was a cornerstone of Seyfried's (at the time) kmt protocol.
As far as the human interventions go there is only the one published intervention - 6 patients - https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2024.1489812 - Successful application of dietary ketogenic metabolic therapy in patients with glioblastoma: a clinical study
There are a bunch of case studies (about 15 in total i think), which I'm sure you saw.
about 40 patients demonstrating keto was well tolerated during standard of care treatment in other studies.
and about 18 KMT papers where seyfried isn't directly involved, covering about 250 patients, all basically saying its tolerated as well.
none of this contradicts the mitochondrial metabolic theory of cancer. so yeah, if Gorski wants to hang onto the somatic mutation theory of cancer that is fine, but he doesn't actually have anything interesting to say about the metabolic theory other then he wants more data - whooptidoo - every theory and study wants more data.
And I mean, those single cases that he presents in this video are a huge red flag, that just isn’t science and isn’t how a legitimate scientist presents evidence.
It is when your close to retirement age and you don't worry about tenure and committees anymore. His papers haven't been retracted, which is the key point, and his human study protocols are implemented in ongoing trials. So his theory is interesting and worth thinking about, and not dismissing - even if you don't like someone if they have a theory that makes predictions with measurable outcomes - it's interesting.
well, someone was making fun of zero carbers using a meme which inspired me today
anti-zero-carb-inspiration
I agree salt by itself is fine, but combined with sugar and other simple carbohydrates, you’ve got all the triggers that make people addicted to junk food.
yup, totally agreed, salt combined with carbohydrates (simple or complex) is a recipe for hyper tension.
I won’t comment on the other points since I disagree on plants being bad in general, but neither of us will be able to convince the other. So eat what you like and what agrees with you, and I’ll do the same.
100%. Allow me to have some nuance - people can be, and are, perfectly healthy on a plant based diet. i.e. lots of people tolerant plants very well, but not everybody can.
I just wish there were more recipe and picture posts in this community.
I post food on occasion - but my version of zero carb is quite lazy! so my food photos are a little repetitive
my last food photo
You will not find any research backing the idea that salt is unhealthy before the point it starts to taste bad, because all it has ever been is a hypothesis.
There are some t2ds who are salt super-responders, there is literature documenting them. However, if you fix their insulin that goes away.
Wait a cotton picking minute - no pulling wool over your eyes.
Everyone in the chain must give a shit, or you will only get shit.