68
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] PosadistInevitablity@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It’s a moral consideration this isn’t a fucking logic problem.

I don’t value ecosystems, but I do value animal lives. Unsure how I could be wrong about that on a moral level.

If a pack of dogs was loose in a forest; I would not kill the dogs, for example.

[-] AdlachGyfiawn@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Don't be silly. All moral considerations are logic problems. Theory without praxis is immaterial at best and concern trolling at worst.

And ecosystems are made up of a sum of lives, animal and otherwise. Their collapse inherently kills animals. There is no moral superiority in allowing deaths by inaction.

[-] LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net 7 points 1 month ago

If the pack of wild dogs was eating every single deer and you wouldn't kill the dogs, you do not value animal lives.

this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2024
68 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13441 readers
1101 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS