this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2024
244 points (98.8% liked)

Games

38929 readers
710 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 79 points 10 months ago (3 children)

one of the few publications that seemed to do actual work. what a shame.

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 36 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Indeed. Its sad to see a reputable name go before something far less reputable, like Kotaku for example.

I guess it must be true, hate clicks and outrage do generate more revenue than real, genuine gaming articles written with pretty good journalistic integrity.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago (2 children)

eh, kotaku has some solid articles and reporting as well. gaming journalism in general is incestuous shit but most of the anti-kotaku sentiment comes from goonergate shit

[–] Ashtear@lemm.ee 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The hilarious thing about you getting downvotes immediately is Kotaku led the reporting on this news this morning. Link is in the posted article, y'all.

[–] Maven 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Nah, Kotaku had a shit reputation for years before gamergate got shat into existence. Their reporting was sloppy and often wrong, most of them sucked at the games they were reviewing, they spammed out vapid clickbait articles about nothing to farm ad rev. The only reason people respect them now is because they were positioned opposite gamergate, as if two things can't both suck.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world -3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

no. literally no one gave a shit about kotaku before goonergate.

[–] Maven 2 points 10 months ago

You're joking, right? Pre-2012, it was one of the most visited sites on the internet and in the top 20 gaming sites. They weren't some no-name blog. Then after they hired Totilo, their shitty pop-tabloid reporting became so infamous even Forbes had articles about it, well before gamergate was ever a thing. This all used to be sourced info on the wiki page.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

a reputable name

?

they were wholly owned by gamestop. their magazine was a lever to drive gamestop subscriptions and upsells. y'all worried about kotaku crack me up, if there were real ethics in game journalism a supposedly independent publication reviewing the products wouldn't be owned by the largest vendor of the products.

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Is it actual work to just say what the publishers tell you to say and give everything a 7?

[–] SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If you actually read their interviews and reviews you will see that it is way more in-depth than any YouTube essays or twitch streams. It sucks that those things attract more people because I get way more informed at an objective level with GI articles and similar podcasts.

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm gonna guess they got better in the 15 years since I was subscribed.

[–] SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 months ago

I wouldn’t say better, if you didn’t like them in their earlier days then I doubt you would like them now. To me, they just provided more thorough insights into the games than random YouTuber or Reddit comment section.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Eh.... they were beholden to the games industry as much as any publication, and perhaps more due to their ownership.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

yeah i meant work as in interesting content rather than journalism. never referred to GI for reviews but they had fun content.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

that's fair. I suspect their relationship with gamestop, which had it's own mini-e3 for a while, led to a ton of great content discovery that many journalists didn't get access to back in the day.