588
submitted 3 months ago by gytrash@feddit.uk to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

"Signal is being blocked in Venezuela and Russia. The app is a popular choice for encrypted messaging and people trying to avoid government censorship, and the blocks appear to be part of a crackdown on internal dissent in both countries..."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] D61@hexbear.net 8 points 3 months ago

Self defense is self defense, would we expect some different behavior from a country being attacked from outside interests with publicly accessible end to end encryption services?

[-] Railcar8095@lemm.ee -5 points 3 months ago

Publicly accessible: reviewed and audited by hundreds of teams that confirmed there's no backdoor. Venezuelan, Russian and Chinese governments didn't find the holes, even having access to the code. If they did, they would be exploiting it to.... reeducate.

Yeah, I would expect to trust that. Still, you said yourself, the problem is that is used by dissidents. And we can't have that, right?

[-] ComradePupIvy@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 3 months ago

Open source, except when they do not publish it. Funded incredibly heavily buy the United States Intelegency Agencies. That would be more than enough to raise red flags for any nation that is not on the best terms with the United States.

Signal in all likelyhood is a honey pot

[-] fira959@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 months ago

Funded by the US? Well thats the entire internet, including Tor, Linux and Matrix...

Amazing how much BS is spread here

[-] ComradePupIvy@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 3 months ago

The server is arguably more important, that is where the data and meta data itself are stored. Linux has never hid its source code for a year, and matrix can be self hosted.

I mean if you want to trust a honey pot go right ahead

[-] fira959@lemmy.ml -2 points 3 months ago

Your claim about it being a honey pot is entirely baseless. There is a significantly better chance you are working for the US to prevent people from using signal...

[-] ComradePupIvy@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 3 months ago

Yes because the US does not want you useing a central server in its jurisdiction so it can force the organistation to give out all the meta data while not being alowed to alert anyone. How dare you use something that could give the US so much information in one easy package

[-] fira959@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 months ago

You clearly have no clue how the internet or signal works. There is no information on signal servers that arent already available through the telcos, litterally zero

[-] ComradePupIvy@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 3 months ago

Did I say the prefrence was to use normal telecomunication providers? or that the internet in general where super secure, no, but Signal is not secure either, and it in all likelyhood a honey pot

[-] fira959@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 months ago

There is no reason to assume that based on the fact that they do not posess any information on their servers that would not be available to authorities anyway. You are making up nonesense based on your own delusions.

this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2024
588 points (98.4% liked)

Privacy

32177 readers
254 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS