409
submitted 1 month ago by Beaver@lemmy.ca to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Boozilla@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Good. Taxing tips is bullshit. Even 45 can be accidentally right once in a while. Do Tax on Wall Street Speculation instead.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Why is it bullshit? Just because your income comes from clients instead of your boss doesn't mean it's not income.

Hell, the US became the US because of the "no taxation without representation" thing, should people who work for tip not be eligible to vote?

[-] Boozilla@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Because employers use tips as a reason to pay workers less, even less than minimum wage. It's a tax on the lower working class. Meanwhile executives like Bezos pay almost zero taxes.

[-] breakingcups@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

So why choose the wrong solution then? Tax billionaires fairly. Don't arbitrarily make the waiter not pay taxes but the cook in the back has to? That's not equal, that's not fair.

[-] Boozilla@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I think tips in general are bullshit and the real answer is to raise minimum wage much higher, so it keeps up with worker productivity. I would prefer that, and to do away with tipping culture entirely. However, passing a tax relief thing is always much easier goal in the US than raising minimum wage, so I'm not letting an ideal internet reply guy solution get in the way of something that actually helps workers. As for it not being fair to the cooks in the back, different jobs pay differently. And believe it or not, some wait staff do share tips with the cooks.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Ok but you said so yourself, it's work being paid, it's earnings, are you saying people shouldn't pay taxes on their earnings?

[-] Boozilla@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

They will still pay income taxes, just not on the tips portion. This is not at all different than the tiered taxes we already have.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It is different though... At the moment they're paying on all their income based on tax brackets, with the current they'll only pay on the regular salary part.

I worked for tip for over a decade, it would have meant not paying taxes on about half my earnings, with tax brackets that would have meant (where I'm at) 3500$ in taxes instead of 13000$ because two thirds of the first half would have been under the minimum taxable amount.

Tips aren't a gift, it's salary that comes from customers in exchange for services. You're creating two classes of lower income citizens if you say that some people don't have to pay taxes on what might be the majority of their income while the rest pays taxes on all their income.

It's a bad solution.

[-] Boozilla@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Nah, you just don't understand or appreciate the economics of our tax system at all. It's OK for people who make less to pay less in taxes or even no taxes. We have a so-called progressive tax for this very reason. Those who make millions and pay no taxes are the real problem with our system in the US. They find all of the loopholes and pay almost zero taxes, while people who are barely scraping by pay punitive tax percentages relative to their take home pay. The bad solution is wanting to fully tax people who can't afford housing or healthcare while letting the billionaires skate. Trying to frame it as "their fair share" is absolutely laughable. The lack of concern for the billionaires not paying taxes here is very telling.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 weeks ago

What? I think you're the one who can't appreciate how taxation works (hell, I work in that field).

Someone making 50k/year in salary should pay the same amount of taxes as someone making 20k in salary and 30k in tip.

What you're arguing for is for that second person to pay taxes on 20k only and to get the rest tax free, meaning they would end up with more in their pockets than the first person even though their total income is the same, that makes no fucking sense and only incentivize tip work in order to maximize people's net earnings.

If you're tired of being asked for tip everywhere then you haven't seen anything if tip is tax free.

[-] Rustywhims@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

I would be thrilled if Harris announced taxes on Wall Street shenanigans.

But I highly doubt it

this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2024
409 points (97.4% liked)

politics

18802 readers
4419 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS