64
Cost of running the Olympics (journals.sagepub.com)
submitted 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) by Blaze@sopuli.xyz to c/dataisbeautiful@mander.xyz

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X221098741#:~:text=The%20average%20return%2Don%2Dinves

Los Angeles was able to have a surplus as most of the infrastructure was already built before the Games.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] hakase@sh.itjust.works 12 points 4 weeks ago

I think blue and red are supposed to be "Profit" and "Loss", not revenues and costs, since I'm pretty sure all Olympics have both revenues and costs. Also, the Y-axis is already labeled deficit and surplus, so why not just use those instead of conflicting, misleading terms?

[-] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 3 points 4 weeks ago

There is another graph for detailed cost and revenue in the article (figure 2), the one is meant to be a summary to differenciate deficit and surplus

this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
64 points (100.0% liked)

Data is Beautiful

852 readers
35 users here now

Be respectful

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS