1281
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

So 3 people we know of between the two of us were wealthy and lived some type of homeless lifestyle occasionally to full time. And so by your logic, the remaining hundreds of thousands of homeless should be penalized and not offered housing because these 3 individuals would decline it?

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I never said any such thing. All I said was that unfortunately some people do need incentive to have shelter. Which I substantiated with an example, and you did as well. They're the minority, but some people just flat out don't want what we want. That has no bearing on what we should do for the people who do want and need shelter.

[-] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Oh sorry, I may have mistaken you for a different commenter then. Lemmy's reply system isn't super easy for me to navigate.

I think if a millionaire wants to rough it, camp, etc, they should be allowed to. Any adult should be allowed to roam. It's what our ancestors did.

this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
1281 points (98.0% liked)

Solarpunk Urbanism

1786 readers
1 users here now

A community to discuss solarpunk and other new and alternative urbanisms that seek to break away from our currently ecologically destructive urbanisms.

Checkout these related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS