368
True? (lemmy.ca)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Wilzax@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

While I don't think it's as high as 90% of users, I admit I didn't think about people who would subject themselves to Arch just to not take advantage of what Arch has to offer.

(But seriously, why would anyone choose to do this when they can just install Mint)

[-] probableprotogen@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 weeks ago

Rolling releases and very "vanilla" packages. I get the upstream configurations with very few changes, making it better imo to modify and rice into what I want.

[-] Sestren@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

Rolling releases for issues with newer hardware and the AUR. That's really all there is to it. There are plenty of ways to be "unique", but at the the of the day, nobody else is ever really going to care.

If I bought myself a 6 year old Thinkpad, I'd put Mint over Arch on it in a heartbeat. For the desktop that's constantly upgrading, it gets Arch because it has the fastest releases and biggest community to troubleshoot stuff.

[-] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 1 points 4 weeks ago

Pacman and the aur

this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2024
368 points (90.4% liked)

linuxmemes

20707 readers
677 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS