1551
submitted 3 months ago by Not_mikey@slrpnk.net to c/memes@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 112 points 3 months ago

I don't actually know if it's considered a deepfake when it's just a voice; but I've been using the hell out of Speechify, which basically deepfakes voices and pairs them with a text input.

...so... nursing school, we have an absolute fuck-ton of reading assignments. Staring at a page of text makes my brain melt, but thankfully nowadays everything's digital, so I can copy entire chapters at a time, and paste them into Speechify. Now suddenly I have Snoop-dogg giving me a lecture on how to manage a patient as they're coming out of general anesthesia. Gets me through the reading fucking fast, and it retains so, SO much better than just trying to cram a bunch of flavorless text.

[-] Glytch@lemmy.world 54 points 3 months ago

Speechify also pays the people who's voices they're using rather than taking them from publicly available videos and recordings without permission.

[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 7 points 3 months ago

That's also the business model behind ad localization now, they'll pay the actor once for appearing on set and then pay them royalties to keep AI editing the commercial to feature different products in different countries.

[-] Glytch@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

If they're up front about it and if the actor agrees to it (as with Speechify), I don't see a problem with that. SAG should also be involved to try and determine fair compensation.

[-] hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world 32 points 3 months ago

Wait that's genius. I would listen to Snoop Dogg teaching me particle physics any day of the week.

[-] Paradachshund@lemmy.today 17 points 3 months ago

I think the key here is you're using it for yourself only.

[-] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago

I think it comes down more to understanding what the tech is potentially good at, and executing it in an ethical way. My personal use is one thing; but Speechify made an entire business out of it, and people aren't calling for them to be burned to the ground.

As opposed to Google's take of "OMG AI! RUB IT INTO EVERYONE'S NOSE, THEY'RE GONNA LOVE IT!" and just slapping it onto the internet, and then pretending to be surprised when people ask for a pizza recipe and it tells them to add Elmer's Glue to it...

Two controlled inputs giving a predictable output; vs just letting it browse 4chan and see what happens. The tech industry definitely seems to lean toward the later, which is fucking tragic, but there are gems scattered throughout the otherwise pure pile of shit that LLMs are at the moment.

[-] Paradachshund@lemmy.today 0 points 3 months ago

In my opinion using someone's voice without their consent in a public way is unethical, but you doing it in private doesn't hurt anyone.

[-] P00ptart@lemmy.world -4 points 3 months ago

Say that again, but think of a a fat old white dude jerking off to what he's created, and you'll figure out several ways it could hurt someone.

this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2024
1551 points (97.7% liked)

memes

10552 readers
3078 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS