111
submitted 3 months ago by thomask to c/rust@programming.dev
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago

It seems it would be a lot easier to work on the GCC compiler, and work with others to bootstrap GCC (if it hasn't already been done). Getting the GCC Rust compiler able to compile some version of rustc probably wouldn't be that hard, and then you can just use that version to compile up the chain to modern Rust.

[-] BatmanAoD@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago

That's the mrustc project the author mentions. He wants Rust to be bootstrapped earlier in the process.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

Sure, but I guess I don't really understand the argument. Why would Rust need to be involved earlier in the process? Isn't the point to have a way to compile rustc completely from source?

I guess it's cool to have multiple ways to get there, but that project would take way less work and get to the same end goal. It sounds to me like the author is trying to justify a cool project instead of trying to solve a real problem. That's completely fine, but I think most people would be happy with the mrustc project.

[-] BatmanAoD@programming.dev 3 points 3 months ago

I asked, and it's to replace some of the bits that require Perl: https://hachyderm.io/@notgull/113035157972265244

You can see the full (current) sequence here: https://bootstrapping.miraheze.org/wiki/Live-bootstrap

this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2024
111 points (97.4% liked)

Rust

6058 readers
60 users here now

Welcome to the Rust community! This is a place to discuss about the Rust programming language.

Wormhole

!performance@programming.dev

Credits

  • The icon is a modified version of the official rust logo (changing the colors to a gradient and black background)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS