News

35867 readers

1921 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.

Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.

7. No duplicate posts.

If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.

All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

JonsJava@lemmy.world

gedaliyah@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

505

A worker won $600,000 after Twitter said his goodbye messages showed he had resigned. The case holds valuable lessons for staff and employers. (www.businessinsider.com)

submitted 1 year ago by AnActOfCreation@programming.dev to c/news@lemmy.world

31 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A former Twitter employee, Gary Rooney, won about $600,000 for unfair dismissal after Twitter assumed he resigned by not responding to Elon Musk's "hardcore" work email.

The case highlighted the importance of clear communication between employers and employees, especially regarding significant changes in employment terms.

Rooney’s private Slack messages, where he discussed leaving, were used as evidence by Twitter, underscoring that internal communication on platforms like Slack is not always private and can be used in legal disputes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I would assume they have some basic stuff running 24x7. I can't imagine a network which doesn't have Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) running 24x7 these days. There's also things like firewall logs, which are almost certainly being captured (or at least netflow). Stuff like screen recording and mouse monitoring is probably saved for extreme cases. That said, my own experience has been pretty close to:

We’re not going to look over your shoulder while you watch YouTube videos but if we notice you’re watching a lot of or you start visiting porn sites, we’re going to start monitoring you.

Quite frankly, no one's got time for that shit. I work at an organization with a bit north of 25,000 employees, and we have less than a dozen security analysts. While I could run a search against our firewall logs and see evidence of folks dicking around. I have much better things to do, like running down abnormal processes and writing up reports on users who got their systems infected while dicking around. And that's really the way it comes to our attention, most of the time. Someone is out trying to download movies or software on their work laptop (you'd think people would know better....) and they pickup malware. We get an alert and start investigating. While trying to determine the source, we pull browser history and see the user out on "SketchyMovieSite[.]xyz". And then their dicking around becomes our problem, mostly because the site had a malicious redirect, which is where the infection came from.

So ya, they may not be looking, but I'd always bet they are recording. Logging isn't useful if it isn't recording at the time of the compromise.

I would assume they have some basic stuff running 24x7.  I can't imagine a network which doesn't have Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) running 24x7 these days. There's also things like firewall logs, which are almost certainly being captured (or at least netflow).  Stuff like screen recording and mouse monitoring is probably saved for extreme cases.  That said, my own experience has been pretty close to:

> We’re not going to look over your shoulder while you watch YouTube videos but if we notice you’re watching a lot of or you start visiting porn sites, we’re going to start monitoring you.

Quite frankly, no one's got time for that shit.  I work at an organization with a bit north of 25,000 employees, and we have less than a dozen security analysts.  While I could run a search against our firewall logs and see evidence of folks dicking around.  I have much better things to do, like running down abnormal processes and writing up reports on users who got their systems infected while dicking around.  And that's really the way it comes to our attention, most of the time.  Someone is out trying to download movies or software on their work laptop (you'd think people would know better....) and they pickup malware.  We get an alert and start investigating.  While trying to determine the source, we pull browser history and see the user out on "SketchyMovieSite[.]xyz".  And then their dicking around becomes our problem, mostly because the site had a malicious redirect, which is where the infection came from.

So ya, they may not be looking, but I'd always bet they are recording.  Logging isn't useful if it isn't recording at the time of the compromise.