this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2024
822 points (98.5% liked)

People Twitter

7829 readers
1069 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 45 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's the trick: they all are.:-)

[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 28 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Gish galloping requires constant fiasco. Now are they all on purpose or are some of them happy accidents?

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

See also: Reverse Gish Gallop. I just had someone try to pull that on me yesterday in !linuxmemes@lemmy.world, i.e. they're everywhere.

[–] lolrightythen@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

That was great! Thank you

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I don't think they're either really "on purpose" or "accidents". It's not calculated or truly random, it's just who these people naturally are. And it plays because unfortunately a lot of us Americans are idiots.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah that's how I see it too. Political strategist types can't understand that not everything is a grand strategy. They assume if they can't understand the strategy it must be 5-D chess or whatever. But maybe there is no strategy, and they're just being idiots?

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's game theory terminology, like flight is a "strategy", not that the bird (or bacterial spore or whatever) has the slightest clue about what it's doing.

It sounds better than "what works is what works", I guess.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

In the biological/evolutionary world "strategy" has a very different meaning than the colloquial usage here. we know animals, bacteria, plants, etc can't actively "strategize" like humans do.

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 1 points 10 months ago

If a monkey does something, sees that it works, and continues doing that, is that a "strategy"? I suppose that depends on one's POV, at which point it doesn't seem "wrong" to say it, nor wrong to not say it.

[–] thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

"flood the zone" strategy