553
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech to c/childfree@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Zorque@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Wouldn't this be prime age for boomers to be great grandparents? Unless they mean paying for their grandkids college...

[-] neblem@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Boomers are 1946-1964. Definitely the older in the generation are in the great grandparent years, especially if they and their kids had kids young, but the younger boomers, especially if they and their kids had their first kids later, will be grandparents.

[-] Zorque@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

I wouldn't exactly call that prime time for them to be grandparents, then...

[-] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago

if they had kids at 30 their kids could have kids at 30.

[-] Zorque@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

"If" is doing a lot of heavy lifting.

And that's still just for the youngest of that generation, not the whole of it... I don't know about you, but I'd hardly call a minority of a minority "prime".

load more comments (2 replies)
this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024
553 points (95.3% liked)

childfree

1955 readers
1 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS