78
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

It should be mandatory for any company to release that publicly anonymously.

[-] Albbi@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago

It's often illegal for a company to disclose that they've been compelled to provide information to law enforcement. So many companies had a warrant canary which said they had not been served with a request for information.

Reddit for instance removed their warrant canary 8 years ago

[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Yeah, that's the gag order aspect. I think we should have protection laws in place to determine how many times, say, in a quarter, a company is asked to comply with surveillance requests. Nothing to hurt any investigations, just to service us as due notice.

this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
78 points (100.0% liked)

Cybersecurity

5880 readers
11 users here now

c/cybersecurity is a community centered on the cybersecurity and information security profession. You can come here to discuss news, post something interesting, or just chat with others.

THE RULES

Instance Rules

Community Rules

If you ask someone to hack your "friends" socials you're just going to get banned so don't do that.

Learn about hacking

Hack the Box

Try Hack Me

Pico Capture the flag

Other security-related communities !databreaches@lemmy.zip !netsec@lemmy.world !securitynews@infosec.pub !cybersecurity@infosec.pub !pulse_of_truth@infosec.pub

Notable mention to !cybersecuritymemes@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS