Linux for Leftists

1232 readers

1 users here now

A Community for all leftists wanting to join and being part of a community that talks about Linux, Unix and the Free Software Community

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

AmeliaDaFloof@lemmygrad.ml

Prioritise RAM or processor? (lemmygrad.ml)

submitted 2 years ago by redtea@lemmygrad.ml to c/leftistunix@lemmygrad.ml

15 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Hello Comrades,

Thanks for all your advice about setting up Linux. It was a success. The problem is that I’m now I’m intrigued and I’d like to play around a bit more.

I’m thinking of building a cheap-ish computer but I have a few questions. I’ll split them into separate posts to make things easier. Note: I won’t be installing anything that I can’t get to work on Linux.

Should I prioritise RAM or the processor? My budget is limited so I will have to make a choice between RAM and the processor. Would it be better to go for e.g. 32GB RAM and a slower processor, or 8GB RAM and a faster processor? Or is balance better? Say, 16GB RAM and a 'medium' processor (that's 'medium' between the 'slower' and the 'faster' option within my budget, not 'medium' for the market).

Intel or AMD?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Prologue7642@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 years ago

It depends on what is meant by slower CPU. If you can, I would go with current gen staff anyway, and then it doesn't matter. You can upgrade no matter which CPU you choose. The only factor is a number of channels your CPU have (which will almost always be 2), what generation of DDR it supports (current gen is DDR5 but if you go for older it will be cheaper DDR4) and how many DIMM slots your motherboard have.

Also, AMD is almost always better value with lower power consumption, with some exception in some rare use cases.