[-] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 18 hours ago

You've got some great memes stored away for rainy days.

[-] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 17 points 19 hours ago

Half a percent a year for every year of unbridled neoliberal capitalism.

[-] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 1 day ago

First, I'm going into my own office on the way to the airport for a few flights. Everyone in economy is getting it. Then when I get home I'm getting a part time job as a delivery driver to commercial buildings in major cities and taking liberties visiting every floor as I drop off the noodles. On the way, if I get stuck in traffic, I'm treating my vexed driver comrades to some enlightenment. On the weekends, I'm going to the people: soccer matches, protests.

The only fuckers I'm not using this on are the CEOs, bankers, directors, etc. I want them to wonder what the fuck is happening and I don't want to create hundreds of petite bourgeois trots.

[-] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 2 days ago

Xi moonlighting as the hit hip hop sensation, 50 yuan.

[-] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 days ago

A 2022 analysis from the European Parliament warned that over-reliance on monopolistic suppliers was a major risk for Europe.

🤔

[-] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 2 days ago

Does China have to demand repayment in USD or CFA Francs?

[-] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 3 days ago

In that case, I think I messed up the install. I'll try going straight to the store through the game. Might take me a while because I don't have a monitor/screen at the moment.

[-] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 3 days ago

64!? That's optimistic lol.

[-] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 3 days ago

I couldn't get them to load. I think because I messed up the download and installed them part way through my game. So I've not played them yet. But I do have a key, so I should be able to play if I started again. Unless… do you need to complete the main game first? Maybe it'll let me because I do have a complete save.

[-] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 3 days ago

Sorry for the delay. You picked a difficult topic. I've been thinking about how to tackle it. I'll see what I can do. I say something like the following in some conversations now and again. Dialectics gives me a broader perspective and helps me to explain why things are the way they are.

Interest rates increase and house prices decrease while monthly mortgage payments shoot up. Imagine you agreed to a mortgage to buy a house at 3% interest. Your fixed rate agreement comes to an end.

The central bank puts up interest rates to 4%. The bank, in turn, adds this to it's standard mortgage rate of e.g. 3.9%. Now your interest goes from 3% to 7.9% (4%+3.9%). Your monthly payment grows from $700 to $1200. Interest is the same as rent. If you have a mortgage, the bank is your landlord. The law obscures this relationship.

You could afford $700 but you can't afford $1200. You decide to sell and buy something cheaper. Unfortunately, you're among thousands of others doing the same thing. Every property under $300k gets sold rapidly. You either put an offer in on the day that is advertised or someone else will. Properties priced under $300k increase towards that limit.

Others can afford the properties between $300k and $450k. They sell their house, take the equity, and add it to what they can borrow. The bank says it will lend $250k. A year before, it would have lent $300k. Fewer people can afford the properties nearer to $450k. The sellers lower the price. Again, towards the $300k mark.

The composition of the housing market and homeowners changes. The poorest of those who can afford to 'own' their home are forced to spend more on the privilege. They have less money to spend on consumables. Moneylenders, however, are making the same or more than before on mortgages, even though they are lending less.

But it's uneven and contradictory. The poorer consumers stop spending so much at the coffee shop, pub, and takeaway. They spend less on clothes. These shops, etc, lose income. They can't pay off their credit card debt. Some close down. They stop paying the rent on their commercial property. Some landlords default on their commercial mortgages. The banks lose some income.

To stay open, the remaining shops raise their prices to cover the increase in their own rent or mortgage. Customers (the same people in the verge of repossession proceedings) pay the difference. The bank is now lending money to fewer businesses, but it's income stays the same or increases because those who continue to pay, pay more.

The customers in the coffee shop now expects a lot more. They're paying $8 for a coffee, they feel entitled to the best service and less inclined to tip. They fight each other for a table and chair in the restaurant. Animosity prevails. The customer-workers struggle against each other and the barista. Social life just became a lot more alienated. Try building solidarity among this lot.

To get any income back that the bank does lose from defaults, they raise interest rates, further driving the cycle of impoverishing the workers and enriching/impoverishing the moneylenders. But whereas the banks win and lose, the workers only lose. Some cannot afford to move or remortgage. They default and their home is repossessed. The bank sells it and recoups it's loan (most of the time – but things were especially uneven after the 2008 financial crash). If it can't and goes bankrupt, the state bails out the bank.

When the state hands out money to banks, or like during COVID, people begin to spend more (there is more money on circulation) it will later raise interest rates to slow down spending. But when interest rates increase and spending slows down, the above cycle starts again.

The bank and the customer are dialectically related. The bank doesn't exist without the customer. In late capitalism, the customer can't exist without a bank account and some form of borrowing (even if it's just the promise of an unarranged overdraft). But the bank is constantly trying to take everything from the customer. It is their reason for existing. The bank is the face of the imperialist, the customer of the worker.

Interest rates, as a relation, are a mechanism of and they reveal the transfer of wealth from poor to rich. Anything not taken by your employer is in one way or another taken by the bank. You can't see this without dialectics; you feel the pinch, you see the holes in your shoes, but you don't make the connection.

And some of what your employer takes from you, is only taken because they themselves have to pay the bank or they have to pay suppliers who also need to charge more because they are owned by the bank.

By unfolding interest rates as a relation, rather than as a simple number that goes up and down linearly, we can see that it is a microcosm of capitalism.

[-] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 5 days ago

If there's no straight month, why are all the others in a row?

25
submitted 9 months ago by redtea@lemmygrad.ml to c/genzedong@lemmygrad.ml

Short video about current floods in Libya and how they are so much worse due to the deliberate sabotage of the NATO campaign.

Just came across this channel. Looks like one to keep an eye on for African news.

36
submitted 10 months ago by redtea@lemmygrad.ml to c/genzedong@lemmygrad.ml

They insist on controlling the media, the publishing, the schools, the teachers, the curriculum, the judiciary, the museums, and the curators. But they only use their power for good. They hold themselves to the highest standards in the search of the truth and the presentation of the truth. Honest! Their independent watchdogs confirmed it. And why would they lie, anyway?

11
Hummus society (lemmygrad.ml)
submitted 10 months ago by redtea@lemmygrad.ml to c/memes@lemmygrad.ml

Looking back through my cursive handwritten notes, I noticed my past self was very concerned with hummus society. What could this mean?

1

Here's a playlist on YouTube that includes 'game movies'. Someone has taken all the story parts of games and edited them together into movies. The whole list is in Spanish but note that some only have Spanish subtitles whereas others have Spanish subtitles and Spanish audio.

Invidious link: https://yewtu.be/search?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fplaylist%3Flist%3DPLWxBoZFZCce1LUbtciI2xzDvcXiI8WXH5

1

Anki is spaced-repetition software. It works on the basis of the 'forgetting curve'. The idea is that new information is soon forgotten but if you remind yourself an hour later, you'll remember till the next day; and if you remind yourself the next day, you'll remember till next week; and if you remind yourself next week, you'll remember for a month, etc.

I've heard that one of the better ways to use Anki is creating your own decks. Personally, I find this to be a lot of effort. Too much for me to bother making individual cards.

I am experimenting with new ways to make cards. I'm no expert but here's what I have found.

The first way is to use Google sheets. In column 1, include a native language word or phrase. There's a formula to translate each of these into your target language using country codes.

For English to Spanish, click cell B1 and enter =GOOGLETRANSLATE(A1,"en","es"). Tap enter. Now click cell B1 then click and hold the 'drag button' in the bottom right of the cell and drag this down column B to the end of the list in column A. This should translate everything. English column A, Spanish column B.

Save the document as a csv file with text separated by tabs or semicolons. Open the Anki app, create a new deck, and import. Find the csv file, play with the settings. Voila.

One way of making lists of useful (to you) words is through Calibre. Put an ebook that you want to read into calibre. Find it in the list, right-click and press 'Edit book'. When the new window opens, click Tools > Reports > Words. Sort by 'Times used'. This arranges all the words in the book by frequency. You can copy this list into Google sheets, as above. If you're new to the language, sort by most frequent as you'll get a better payoff for the effort.

(Be warned that a lot of high frequency words are functional and/or have many, many meanings. If e.g. Spanish is a new language, one or two key definitions is fine to start with. You can add nuance later. You can also delete the proper nouns: e.g. you don't need a translation of 'Marx' if it's the same in both languages.)

If you have a better vocabulary, scroll down and grab the words that are used only e.g. 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3 times in the book. Getting Anki lists like this, you can front-load the vocabulary for a book that you want to read and memorise the relevant vocab on the bus or the toilet.

(What does Lenin's Imperialismo: fase superior del capitalismo look like word frequency-wise? The top 12 words are de, la, en, el, los, y, que, del, a, las, se, por. The most frequent substantive word, at number 13, used 369 times, is 'desconocido'. Later comes 'Capital' m, used 207 times. 'Imperialismo' 183. 'Bancos' 170. 'Millones' 155. 'Capitalismo' 131. …)

If you read the book at the same time, you'll recognise the vocab as you read. (It might take a long time to come across the less frequent words—one that's only used once might be on the last page.)

Another way of creating lists is using your favourite song lyrics. Get these from a search engine, search for 'song name+letra' then search for the 'song name+lyrics English' to see if there's a translation. If not you can decide how fun it will be for you to translate it yourself or you could use the Google sheets method. Then put one language in one column and the other in the next column. If you have a translation, you can probably use any spreadsheet software. But the cvs file needs to be in UTF-8, I believe.

Another method involves reading books on Kindle. Every time you don't know a word or sentence, click it and get the translation. Then either highlight that word or the whole sentence (for context). Once finished with the book (because it's too hard, boring, or you get to the end) the highlights ('notes') can be exported. (If you read through your notes to recap all the words/sentences that you struggled with, and do it again a week later, it's spaced repetition.)

There's also a way to transfer these notes into Anki cards. There are some scripts/programs in GitHub that could be useful for this. I've not played with it yet but VocabSieve should allow you to import Kindle lookups, translate them, and export this data as a file that can be imported to Anki.

With all these methods, you kind of have to trust the translation software. I've found it to be good enough for English to Spanish. The odd translation is obviously wrong but otherwise, it's fine.

Hopefully these help someone else to avoid the tedium of making Anki decks but in a way that ensures the vocab in your decks is relevant to you.

You can, of course, do things the not-so-old fashioned way. Rather than importing your vocab to Anki, use your spreadsheet. You'll just have to work out the timings for yourself. Then you could hide the first column, and type the translation of the word in the second column into the third column. The next day, hide the first two columns and type the translation of the words in the third column into the fourth column. You can change the colour of rows of words that become too easy and create a colour-coded system for reviewing these monthly, yearly, etc.

1
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by redtea@lemmygrad.ml to c/learnspanish@lemmygrad.ml

Hola amigos,

Hay muchos videojuegos divertidos. Muchos menos con audio o subtítulos españoles. Pero hay algunos.

Skyrim y Fallout 4 continenen muchísimos textos y audios. También Batman: Arkham Knight, Dying Light, Civilisation VI y Dragon Age: Inquisition. Quizás Spiderman. Last of Us, Unchartered, tienen audios y textos pero no tanto cómo estos otros. Pienso FIFA también. (Ten cuidado con Batman y Spiderman porque es fácil que utilizo dinero real en los menus cuando el idioma está menos familiares. No caes en esa trampa.)

Divinity: Original Sin y Red Dead Redemption (y otros juegos rockstargames) tienen textos españoles al menos. Pensé que Divinity tiene audios pero parece que no.

Esto es un listo mas largo de R****t:

  • Bethesda stuff (Elder Scrolls, Fallout)
  • Blizzard stuff (Diablo, WoW)
  • Cyberpunk
  • Monster Hunter World
  • Witcher 1 [Witcher 3 has Spanish menus, subtitles, etc, but not audio]
  • Lost Ark
  • Battle Chasers: Nightwar
  • Bloodborne/Demon's Souls (maybe not enough voice acting)
  • Fable series
  • Neverwinter Nights 2
  • Lord of the Rings: War in the North
  • Sudeki…
  • Playstation Studios stuff (God of War, Horizon, Ghost of Tsushima, Last of Us, Uncharted, Spiderman, etc.)
  • Assassin's Creed series
  • Destiny games
  • Borderlands series
  • Darksiders series (Genesis is an ARPG)
  • XCOM series (also Gears Tactics)
  • Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor/War
  • Bioshock series
  • Guardians of the Galaxy
  • Sekiro
  • Death Stranding
  • The newer Deus Ex games
  • Ghostwire Tokyo
  • Jedi Fallen Order
  • Beyond Good and Evil
  • Breath of the Wild (minimal voice acting)
  • Child of Light (minimal voice acting?)

I'm unsure if all these have audio but they should have the text language in Spanish. Sometimes, on a console, you'll have to download a language pack. With some games the language can be changed at any time: it's either set by your console language or in the game settings. With e.g. [Assassin's Creed], I believe you get one chance to set the language at the start of the save file.

@rjs001@lemmygrad.ml I found four text based games:

  • Ord – this is very fun, very straightforward. Play it with a DeepL or Google translate window/app open on another device to look up words quickly.
  • Darkside Detective (there's a sequel, too)
  • A Place for the Unwilling (this is English-only audio but it looks mainly text-based so it might be possible to just mute the audio and play it as if it's solely text-based)
  • Grim Fandango

There is also this list, but I am unsure how safe it is to buy from itch.io or to play the free games in your browser: https://itch.io/games/lang-es/tag-text-based (will you let me know if you have any luck/fun with any of these?)

Edit: forgot to add an example.

15
submitted 11 months ago by redtea@lemmygrad.ml to c/games@lemmygrad.ml

I like RPGs. Final Fantasy, Witcher 3, Fallout 3 and 4, Skyrim, Morrowind, Oblivion, etc.

Will I enjoy Monster Hunter: World? Is it good? Does it have a good story? Or is it (too) fetch-questy?

I'm looking at this one because it's available with Spanish audio and text whereas other Monster World games only have Spanish text, if that. So the others aren't an option, but feel free to compare this one to the others.

24

In 2018, Delta airlines unveiled new uniforms made of a synthetic-blend fabric. Soon after, flight attendants began to get sick. Alden Wicker explains how toxic chemicals get in clothes in To Dye For.

Employers caring more about image that health. Iconic duo.

13
Dedicated GPU? (lemmygrad.ml)

Hello Comrades,

Thanks for all your advice about setting up Linux. It was a success. The problem is that I’m now I’m intrigued and I’d like to play around a bit more.

I’m thinking of building a cheap-ish computer but I have a few questions. I’ll split them into separate posts to make things easier. Note: I won’t be installing anything that I can’t get to work on Linux.

Do I need a dedicated graphics card? I'd like to run an HD display as a minimum. (I don't have a 4k monitor at but I wouldn't mind upgrading later if I can save up for one.) Mostly, I'll be streaming or playing videos.

I wouldn't mind playing some games but is a dedicated GPU needed?

If I should look into a GPU (I can always add it in later), what should I look for? (I'm not really interested in the latest AAA games). I wouldn't mind playing HOI4 or Victoria 3 as I hear so much about them.

What are your thoughts on second-hand GPUs? This will obviously cut costs but is there anything to watch out for?

12

Hello Comrades,

Thanks for all your advice about setting up Linux. It was a success. The problem is that I’m now I’m intrigued and I’d like to play around a bit more.

I’m thinking of building a cheap-ish computer but I have a few questions. I’ll split them into separate posts to make things easier. Note: I won’t be installing anything that I can’t get to work on Linux.

Should I prioritise RAM or the processor? My budget is limited so I will have to make a choice between RAM and the processor. Would it be better to go for e.g. 32GB RAM and a slower processor, or 8GB RAM and a faster processor? Or is balance better? Say, 16GB RAM and a 'medium' processor (that's 'medium' between the 'slower' and the 'faster' option within my budget, not 'medium' for the market).

Intel or AMD?

13

Hello Comrades,

Thanks for all your advice about setting up Linux. It was a success. The problem is that I'm now I'm intrigued and I'd like to play around a bit more.

I'm thinking of building a cheap-ish computer but I have a few questions. I'll split them into separate posts to make things easier. Note: I won't be installing anything that I can't get to work on Linux.

Question about storage and swap memory.

I plan to install an SSD of maybe 128–256GB for the system files and a larger HDD for storage. I would partition the SSD so that I could install a few different distros without losing any installation. This way I can commit to some longer experiments before deciding which distro to use.

The question is: should I have the swap partition on the SSD (with the OS partition) or (separately) on the HDD?

And if I install multiple distros, do I need a different swap partition for each one? For example, if I install 16GB RAM, do I need a 16GB partition for, say, Mint, Debian, and Ubuntu? Or can I let them 'share' the swap partition?

Are there any additional security/privacy risks of installing more than one distro on the same SSD card?

8
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by redtea@lemmygrad.ml to c/genzhou@lemmygrad.ml

This is a challenge to an argument that increasing taxes on landowners and property speculators would lower business costs, allowing wage increases.

(drop down) There are some good arguments for a wealth tax.

This is a promising idea, tried before e.g. under the label ‘Keynesianism’, after John Maynard Keynes. Ultimately, it will fail.

Class composition

‘Business owners’, ‘land owners’, and ‘land speculators’ must be put into the broader political economic context. Each group is a different segment of capital. The idea of taxing rentiers to encourage business to pay better wages assumes there is a real struggle between ‘business owners’, ‘land owners’, and ‘land speculators’. This assumption forgets monopoly finance capital – imperialists – which subjugates other capital.

There are further strata within the bourgeoisie. Within each segment, there are two main strata: the haute (big) bourgeoisie and the petite/petty (small) bourgeoisie. E.g. there are corporate landlords with thousands of properties and individual landlords with one or two rental properties.

There are struggles between the big and small bourgeois and between finance capital and the other segments of capital. Overwhelmingly, though, all are subordinated to haute bourgeois monopoly finance capital. This is imperialism.

As Marx and Engels wrote in the Manifesto of the Communist Party:

Our epoch, the epoch of the bourgeoisie … has simplified class antagonisms. Society as a whole is more and more splitting up into two great hostile camps, into two great classes directly facing each other — Bourgeoisie and Proletariat.

Conflicts between finance capital and industrial capital, agricultural capital, etc, can result in international war, where imperialists meet the resistance of other states that are e.g. industrial capitalist.

Lenin explains in ‘The three sources and three component parts of Marxism’:

By destroying small-scale production, capital leads to an increase in productivity of labor and to the creation of a monopoly position for the associations of big capitalists. Production itself becomes more and more social—hundreds of thousands and millions of workers become bound together in a regular economic organism—but the product of this collective labor is appropriated by a handful of capitalists. Anarchy of production, crises, the furious chase after markets and the insecurity of existence of the mass of the population are intensified.

Within the imperial core (mostly the Anglo-European states and Japan) and its peripheries (almost everywhere else), almost all capital is controlled by imperialists. These capitalists may go to war against each other, as in WWI and WWII, but they do not fight themselves.

Imperialist control

I’m not talking about inter-imperialist rivalry in this latter claim. What do I mean? As Lenin explains, imperialists use their finance to bankroll other ventures. This is the system of stocks and shares. With (at most) 50.1% of the shares in a company, the shareholder controls the company.

The imperialist buys half the share capital of a farm, a factory, a mine, etc. They buy a controlling share of a land and consumer-facing corporations. With that controlling share, they hike rent on land and force the business to suppress wages. This increases income and decreases outgoings. The landowner, speculator, and business owner are only competing on the surface. Behind the scenes, they are all on the same team, different capitals, bought by finance capital.

What about the small businesses?

One might contend, ‘But you’re only talking about the big chains and big speculators; most employers are small business owners.’ The small business owners and the landlords with a handful of properties get investment capital, loans, etc, from the banks – i.e. imperialists.

Landowners are required to raise rents and business owners are required to keep wages low because they are controlled by imperialists. This is true of the petit and the haute bourgeois. The petit bourgeois have much less choice in the matter; the haute bourgeois are complicit.

Lenin wrote about this problem, too:

(drop down) Imperialism: The Highest Stage of CapitalismChapter 1 (bold and numbers in square brackets added for emphasis and clarity):

Less than one-hundredth [1%] of the total number of enterprises utilise more than three-fourths [3/4] of the total amount of steam and electric power! Two million nine hundred and seventy thousand [2,970,000] small enterprises (employing up to five workers), constituting 91 per cent of the total, utilise only 7 per cent of the total amount of steam and electric power! Tens of thousands of huge enterprises are everything; millions of small ones are nothing.

…As we shall see, money capital and the banks make this superiority of a handful of the largest enterprises still more overwhelming, in the most literal sense of the word, i.e., millions of small, medium and even some big “proprietors” are in fact in complete subjection to some hundreds of millionaire financiers.

In another advanced country of modern capitalism, the United States of America, the growth of the concentration of production is still greater. … Almost half the total production of all the enterprises of the country was carried on by one-hundredth part [1%] of these enterprises! These 3,000 giant enterprises embrace 258 branches of industry. From this it can be seen that at a certain stage of its development concentration itself, as it were, leads straight to monopoly, for a score [i.e. 20] or so of giant enterprises can easily arrive at an agreement, and on the other hand, the hindrance to competition, the tendency towards monopoly, arises from the huge size of the enterprises. This transformation of competition into monopoly is one of the most important—if not the most important—phenomena of modern capitalist economy, and we must deal with it in greater detail. …

Breaking monopolies?

You might then retort, ‘Break the monopolies; reintroduce competition’. Except it’s been tried before and failed every time. Without abolishing capitalist social relations, we end up back where we started. Lenin:

(drop down) ‘The critique of imperialism’Source

The questions as to whether it is possible to reform the basis of imperialism, whether to go forward to the further intensification and deepening of the antagonisms which it engenders, or backward, towards allaying these antagonisms, are fundamental questions in the critique of imperialism. Since the specific political features of imperialism are reaction everywhere and increased national oppression due to the oppression of the financial oligarchy and the elimination of free competition, a petty-bourgeois-democratic opposition to imperialism arose at the beginning of the twentieth century in nearly all imperialist countries. …

In the United States, the imperialist war waged against Spain in 1898 stirred up the opposition of the “anti-imperialists,” … But as long as all this criticism shrank from recognising the inseverable bond between imperialism and the trusts, and, therefore, between imperialism and the foundations of capitalism, while it shrank from joining the forces engendered by large-scale capitalism and its development, it remained a “pious wish”.

…The petty-bourgeois point of view in the critique of imperialism, the omnipotence of the banks, the financial oligarchy, etc., is adopted by [several] authors[,] … who make no claim to be Marxists, contrast imperialism with free competition and democracy … which is leading to conflicts and war, utter “pious wishes” for peace, etc. …

“It is not the business of the proletariat,” writes Hilferding “to contrast the more progressive capitalist policy with that of the now bygone era of free trade and of hostility towards the state. The reply of the proletariat to the economic policy of finance capital, to imperialism, cannot be free trade, but socialism. The aim of proletarian policy cannot today be the ideal of restoring free competition—which has now become a reactionary ideal—but the complete elimination of competition by the abolition of capitalism.”

…And monopolies have already arisen—precisely out of free competition!

Conclusion

Businesses, large and small, do not keep wages low because rents are too high. Rather, they do so partly because they are controlled by imperialists who insist that landowners increase rents and that employers keep wages as low as possible. If rents are ever capped or lowered, employers keep the extra as profit; they rarely pass it on (without a union fight). This is how imperialists control every facet of the consumer process to reap maximum profits.

view more: next ›

redtea

joined 2 years ago