168
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by UnhingedStopa@sopuli.xyz to c/usa@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] dhork@lemmy.world 38 points 2 months ago

Except they were careful and never actually said "we will give you money to vote for Harris/against Trump". Paying you to call him a human toilet isn't against that law.

[-] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

But the law also includes this language:

Whoever makes or offers to make an expenditure to any person, either to vote… or to vote for…

I take that to mean to pay someone to vote, or to vote for someone. And in this case, CAH is definitely paying people to vote.

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 29 points 2 months ago

The reward is specifically for people to come up with a plan on how they would vote. The reward isn't technically contingent on someone acting on that plan.

[-] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 27 points 2 months ago

Legally speaking they're not paying people to vote, only to do voting-adjacent tasks which is legal

The Register went into the more detail on the legality of it all

[-] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Thank you. Im glad to be wrong, and it’s good to see someone dissecting this issue.

[-] 314xel@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

They're paying people to apologize for not voting last time. What that means is up for the reader. Not the same.

this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2024
168 points (92.4% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7307 readers
344 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS